What's new

"The Alamo"s Status? (1 Viewer)

Randy Korstick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2000
Messages
5,841
1999 was the last year for Laserdisc Players in the US. I believe 2000 was the last year in Japan. The players are still easy to find on ebay. I had four and sold 2 of mine along time ago. One of my remaining 2 is acting up a bit, it skips scenes occasionally on certain discs. I did a quick cleaning of the laser and that seems to have fixed it on all but one disc. I still have around 1,000 of my original 2,500 Laserdisc and still enjoy them. I collected them from 1986-1999. I was surprised that sending the signal through my Sony receiver improved the picture a bit on my 70" LED I purchased last year so I have started watching them on a more regular basis again.


LouA said:
Maybe not. There aren't too many working laser discs players out there any more. When did the stop making the ? Around 1998?
 

mark brown

Supporting Actor
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
568
Watched it a couple of years ago and it looked only fair! No longer have AC3 capability but that is the least worry for Alamophiles!
 

Capnvid

Captain
Joined
Jan 9, 2013
Messages
41
Real Name
Burt Vincent
So where is "The "Alamo Director's Cut" Blu-Ray? Does anybody know besides somebody selling a letterboxed LD on eBay? Yeah, it looks grand, but not good enough. BDR-DL Blu-Rays made from the LD don't make it without considerable noise on 4K TVs. Any real hope or despair to share?
 

Reed Grele

Supporter
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
2,188
Location
Beacon Falls, CT
Real Name
Reed Grele
1.jpg



These are some raw, unmanipulated snapshots (not screen grabs) that I took a few years ago of my Alamo LD. From my Pioneer CLD704, upconverted through my Yamaha receiver, and output via HDMI to my Panny 7000 1080p projector. Screen size approx. 120" diagonal. Not too shabby imho.


6.jpg



7.jpg



8.jpg
 

rsmithjr

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 22, 2011
Messages
1,228
Location
Palo Alto, CA
Real Name
Robert Smith
Not only does the LD look reasonable, it has LD sound. LD sound was almost always better than DVD sound and sometimes even better than Blu-ray sound.


The Alamo makes much more sense as a film from the LD version. I saw it in 35mm 4-track magnetic in the original release--beautiful dye-transfer--but the film didn't work for me then. Far improved in the complete LD version.
 

LouA

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
2,553
Location
New jersey
Real Name
Lou Antonicello
I haven't followed this thread much recently. Just wondering , is there anyone working on a Blu-ray version of the roadshow at this point ?
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,387
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
LouA said:
I haven't followed this thread much recently. Just wondering , is there anyone working on a Blu-ray version of the roadshow at this point ?

There unfortunately have not been any real updates on the roadshow version recently, which I take to mean that there's been no progress to report.
 

LouA

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
2,553
Location
New jersey
Real Name
Lou Antonicello
Josh Steinberg said:
There unfortunately have not been any real updates on the roadshow version recently, which I take to mean that there's been no progress to report.
For some reason, I was under the impression that Criterion was working on THE ALAMO for a potential BD release. I don't recall where I heard or read that ,but assuming that's correct , I would think it would probably be the short version - and I'm just guessing here.
 

JoeDoakes

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
3,462
Real Name
Ray
LouA said:
For some reason, I was under the impression that Criterion was working on THE ALAMO for a potential BD release. I don't recall where I heard or read that ,but assuming that's correct , I would think it would probably be the short version - and I'm just guessing here.
When Mr. Harris tried his last attempt to restore the film (early 2014 I think), there was some talk (perhaps just from fans) that the restored film could show up on Criterion. Unfortunately, that didn't pan out when he could not get any cooperation from MGM. MGM announced that it would release its own blu-ray of the film at a future date after it had completed some work on it, but since then they have not said anything more.
 

Dr Griffin

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
2,426
Real Name
Zxpndk
I don't even think MGM would put the necessary funds into properly restoring the extra roadshow footage for integration into the general release now that I'm sure they have discovered the undeniable reality of the state of the film. RAH reported the film smelled of vinegar in the early 2000s, so by now it must be almost unusable without big bucks. It may no longer be usable at all. They declared the film elements were in fine shape and were "restoring" the extra 20 minutes of roadshow footage, which is an under-estimation of the actual amount of extra footage, I think about 30 minutes or so is more likely. It is truly a horror story: the complete roadshow found at a Canadian film distributor in the early 90s; RAH contacted by the fellow that discovered it; RAH trying to see to it that the film elements ended up at AMPAS, but somehow ending up at MGM; MGM making Laserdisc and VHS transfers, then giving the film a chemical bath that actually accelerated its distruction, then improperly storing it for the next 10 years (early 90s-early 00s); Rah re-inspecting the elements in the late(?) 00's and after MGMs inability to commit funds to its restoration, RAH attempting to fund it himself with other outside monies; and ultimately MGMs refusal of this outside funding. Now that once complete, and most likely only, vesion of the roadshow may now be history. I read the Dust to Dust article recently, and the above information was from memory of that article, so any corrections are most welcome, but I'm fairly sure that is the gist. The fact that there hasn't been a peep about this film from MGM in 18 months should speak volumes.
 

cinemiracle

Screenwriter
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
1,614
Real Name
Peter
Maybe MGM consider that they will lose to much money on any restoration .Let us not forget that the film was a flop in it's original release. I saw it in 70mm in 1960 . What did impress me was the academy award winning best sound.The music and songs were also unforgettable but the film was overlong and very tedious. The finale battle scenes were brilliantly filmed. There are far better films that deserve to be restored.The Alamo does exist in it's 192 minute version ( without overture and exit music etc) I have it on dvd. Someone somewhere,a film collector may have a 70mm version in their collection but won't say.
 

Allansfirebird

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
620
Real Name
Sean
cinemiracle said:
There are far better films that deserve to be restored.

This isn't a question of the quality of the film. The problem is the original elements of the film are now at the end of their usable lives - it deserves to be restored because it MUST be restored, otherwise the roadshow version of the film will be lost to time. Just because it's not a top-tier John Wayne movie doesn't mean we should consign it to the scrap heap like the current MGM management is probably doing now.
 

Richard V

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,962
Real Name
Richard
Thinking about how glorious RAH could have made that Todd A-O film look, but never got the chance due to foolishness, makes me simultaneously angry and despondent.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,427
Real Name
Robert Harris
cinemiracle said:
Maybe MGM consider that they will lose to much money on any restoration .Let us not forget that the film was a flop in it's original release. I saw it in 70mm in 1960 . What did impress me was the academy award winning best sound.The music and songs were also unforgettable but the film was overlong and very tedious. The finale battle scenes were brilliantly filmed. There are far better films that deserve to be restored.The Alamo does exist in it's 192 minute version ( without overture and exit music etc) I have it on dvd. Someone somewhere,a film collector may have a 70mm version in their collection but won't say.
One cannot lose money on something has no cost.

The loss of The Alamo has nothing to do with funding.

It's about ego and hubris.

RAH
 

Richard Gallagher

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2001
Messages
4,275
Location
Fishkill, NY
Real Name
Rich Gallagher
Randy Korstick said:
1999 was the last year for Laserdisc Players in the US. I believe 2000 was the last year in Japan. The players are still easy to find on ebay. I had four and sold 2 of mine along time ago. One of my remaining 2 is acting up a bit, it skips scenes occasionally on certain discs. I did a quick cleaning of the laser and that seems to have fixed it on all but one disc. I still have around 1,000 of my original 2,500 Laserdisc and still enjoy them. I collected them from 1986-1999. I was surprised that sending the signal through my Sony receiver improved the picture a bit on my 70" LED I purchased last year so I have started watching them on a more regular basis again.

I still have a working Pioneer Elite LD player. The last time I used it was to watch Song of the South. I have to remember to take the batteries out of the remote after I use it. I don't want them to leak and possibly ruin the remote.
 

ahollis

Patron
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
8,886
Location
New Orleans
Real Name
Allen
Richard Gallagher said:
I still have a working Pioneer Elite LD player. The last time I used it was to watch Song of the South. I have to remember to take the batteries out of the remote after I use it. I don't want them to leak and possibly ruin the remote.
I still have three players. I picked up two players at the end of the laser Era knowing they would eventually dissapear.
 

JoeDoakes

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
3,462
Real Name
Ray
Robert Harris said:
One cannot lose money on something has no cost.

The loss of The Alamo has nothing to do with funding.

It's about ego and hubris.

RAH
Indeed, it wasn't going to cost MGM anything.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,070
Messages
5,130,035
Members
144,283
Latest member
Nielmb
Recent bookmarks
0
Top