Because they are not Spinal Tap.DaveF said:Why not go straight to 11?
What does this mean for those of us that run Windows virtualized in Parallels or Fusion on a Mac? Will it be impossible to reinstall it if I have to delete and rebuild the VM?mattCR said:(5) There are going to be some people who hate this.. but MS is clearly moving to the way of an install is permanently attached to hardware.. this is akin to the Apple method, but will seem unfamiliar for PC users, who like moving installs from hardware to hardware. The benefit of this is it makes it way, way easier to provide hardened security built into the OS. If the OS locks down expected parameters at the beginning - which we got to some with UEFI - and you can extend that, then security becomes much better off the bat; dedicated encryption routines are likely to become a default in an enterprise offering.
Clinton McClure said:So how many times does Microsoft plan on releasing a new version of Windows 10 so that you would need to upgrade more than once per year? Or are they saying you have 1 year in which to upgrade your current license for free if you wish?
DaveF said:Thanks for the info. I don't really understand the licensing complexities. But when Win10 is released, I'll re-install Win7 on my Macs and upgrade them to Win10. Hopefully there will be a way to make an ISO DVD or USB drive copy from that for subsequent reinstalls.
I'm having serious problems with OS X (and have been reading every article I find discussing whether Apple is losing its way, pro or con). I have no particular interest in switching back to Windows at home. But I need to see what's what with current Windows to make an informed decision in the next year.
So it's free for the first year, and then free thereafter. Why couldn't they say this in a more simplistic manner?And even better: once a qualified Windows device is upgraded to Windows 10, we will continue to keep it up to date for the supported lifetime of the device, keeping it more secure, and introducing new features and functionality over time – for no additional charge.
Dennis Nicholls said:So it's free for the first year, and then free thereafter. Why couldn't they say this in a more simplistic manner?