James St
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- May 8, 1999
- Messages
- 959
Doh, try this.
Its the big tank one outside the hangar. Sorry.
Its the big tank one outside the hangar. Sorry.
Larry:
Are you sure you are playing the same game as the rest of us? Go to www.lucasforums.com and people there are complaining about the game runs like crap on a good computer. I seriously doubt you can run it at 1600x1200 32bit with all effects maxed and still maintain 30 fps.
Also the game looks much better than JK. I don't know how it looks like the same to your eyes. Just look at the models. They are not blocky as in JK. Also look at all the curved surfaces (A graphical capability of Quake3 engine). Especially Lando's new spaceship.... Oh sorry forgot you only played for 10 seconds.
I seriously think you are trolling.
Very positive I'm playing the same game. those people complaining need to upgrade their machines. I have an Athlon 1.3ghz with a gig of RAM and 7200rpm hard drives. My graphic card SHOULD be my weak link as it's the next thing to be upgraded, but apparantly they didn't feel like maxing out the engine. I hardly think I am trolling as this is a REVIEW thread, not a kiss the games ass thread. I was the 3rd person to post a review in this thread, I didn't come here to crap on the game after you all had your lovefest with it, that all occured AFTER I had played the game and given the review. I played the game for 10 minutes, that's enough to judge a games graphics. Did you continue playing pacman for an hour after your first experience hoping the games graphics would get better? (PS they dont) It's almost 3-4 days later, I'm much furthur in the game, and guess what? I still think the graphics suck. The game isn't great. I'm not a fan boy though, so it's up to you whether or not you choose to accept my NON-BIASED opinion or not. I like Star Wars, I don't love it. I was there in 77, and I will be there this May, but that doesn't mean I accept everything that comes out of the Star Wars universe as the holy grail of gaming like it sounds like most of you do. It's an OK game, I imagine the multiplayer will be about as good as the last Jedi Knight.
The point we're all trying to make is that the graphical wonders don't really kick in till the 3rd mission or so. That's all.
Couldn't agree more.
The swamp level is a good example of where there are many details to notice throughout the level.
The reason why I said that level is the most resource-intensive is because I noticed some slight slowdown but nothing unplayable. I'm running the game 800x600 in the high quality mode w/32 bit textures. Other specs include:
Soyo Dragon + Motherboard 266 FSB
Athlon XP 1600 (1.4 ghz)
512 MB DDR
7200 RPM Ultra ATA 100 HD
Xtasy GeForce 2 TI w/64 MB DDR (time for a new card :frowning: )
It's almost 3-4 days later, I'm much furthur in the game, and guess what? I still think the graphics suck.
Why did you keep on playing?
I like the zoom in binocs - it's great for zooming in on Jan's rear end as she works feverishly at a computer
LOL! After reading this I just want to go home and try that out.
As for the game, its great. Personally I feel that its another AAA title from Raven. Can't wait for Soldier of Fortune II and Quake 4. Can you imagine what Raven could do if they get to do Jedi Knight 3 and use the Doom III engine???? I think I need to change my pants just thinking about that.