Colin Jacobson
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2000
- Messages
- 13,328
Why don’t they show it? Other titles I’m following show the list price.
I have no idea why they don't show it.
That doesn't answer how charging MSRP = "gouging".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why don’t they show it? Other titles I’m following show the list price.
I’m thinking they aren’t showing it because they realize $50 is ridiculous for one title. I don’t think we paid that when we saw it at the theater. I don’t think I’ve ever paid MSRP for a disc at Amazon.I have no idea why they don't show it.
That doesn't answer how charging MSRP = "gouging".
But it’s not out of stock. They showed it selling from Amazon for $50.It looks like Amazon is out of stock which means their algorithm reverts back to the MSRP.
With a delivery date of December 12-18 which tells me they’re out of stock.But it’s not out of stock. They showed it selling from Amazon for $50.
True. I guess I just don’t understand the “algorithm”. I follow several titles that I have in my save for later queue at Amazon. All of a sudden Dressed to Kill and Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy are listed at the highest prices I’ve ever seen. I’m assuming it is MSRP, but I don’t know for sure since Amazon neglects to show the MSRP in both of these cases. I try to support HTF by using the links, but these pricing schemes just bother me.With a delivery date of December 12-18 which tells me they’re out of stock.
Well it's all relative. If you want to go on a technicality, it's not gouging, because that's the "suggested retail price" however, the fact that nearly no one anywhere actually sells it at that price means that $30 is the "actual suggested price". So the gouging is implied.I have no idea why they don't show it.
That doesn't answer how charging MSRP = "gouging".
I don’t think I’ve ever paid MSRP for a disc at Amazon.
Well it's all relative. If you want to go on a technicality, it's not gouging, because that's the "suggested retail price" however, the fact that nearly no one anywhere actually sells it at that price means that $30 is the "actual suggested price". So the gouging is implied.
Like when my wife gets all happy that she scored a $150 dress for $50, it's a huge bargain, right? Sure, except that if you look around that $150 number is completely arbitrary, because no where would you ever pay that much for it because, the most expensive place you can find that dress is for like $60.
Gouging can be simply overcharging for a product. Amazon was charging $30 and then switched to $50, pretty clear case of gouging whether it’s MSRP or not. I noticed they now backed off that and don’t show it available now except for some 3rd parties selling it for $33.Maybe not. You still have yet to explain how charging MSRP is "gouging".
Just because you're accustomed to below MSRP doesn't make MSRP "gouging".
This is not gouging, it's supply and demand: When they had a supply, the price was discounted. When they (and seemingly everyone else) sold out, and demand exceeded supply, the discount went away. When they are re-stocked, and have a supply that exceeds the demand, the discount will be back.Gouging can be simply overcharging for a product. Amazon was charging $30 and then switched to $50, pretty clear case of gouging whether it’s MSRP or not.
Except other sites chose not to list it while Amazon listed it for $50 even though they didn't have any in stock. Sorry but that's a gouge supply & demand aside. AND Amazon apparently realized it and removed that $50 pricing. We can disagree. I'll keep an eye out for a restock somewhere.This is not gouging, it's supply and demand: When they had a supply, the price was discounted. When they (and seemingly everyone else) sold out, and demand exceeded supply, the discount went away. When they are re-stocked, and have a supply that exceeds the demand, the discount will be back.
When they start charging a price that is higher than MSRP, they will, by definition, be gouging. Until then, they are simply not offering a discount.Except other sites chose not to list it while Amazon listed it for $50 even though they didn't have any in stock. Sorry but that's a gouge supply & demand aside. AND Amazon apparently realized it and removed that $50 pricing. We can disagree. I'll keep an eye out for a restock somewhere.
Universal said:“We are happy so many consumers are embracing Oppenheimer in 4K Ultra HD and understand that some retailers may currently be out of stock,” the studio’s home entertainment division said in a statement provided to Deadline. “Universal is working to replenish those retailers quickly so fans can watch the film at home in the best picture quality possible.”
$200? More gouging!
This was one of Universal's highest grossing movies of the year. Did people think they wouldn't ship another batch? Well, evidently some people thought that, or they wouldn't be shelling out $200 for a copy on eBay.