1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

Roman Waxy Holiday, in HD

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Alberto_D, Nov 22, 2017.

  1. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    46,120
    Likes Received:
    21,876
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Mark,

    Yesterday, I was going back and forth between Vudu and iTunes regarding Roman Holiday. When I pulled up iTunes I noted a 2007 date attached to iTunes extra movie file. That date confused me. By the way, the iTunes purchase price was $14.99 while Vudu was charging $6.99 as their purchase price.
     
  2. Alberto_D

    Alberto_D Banned
    BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Have they found better 35mm elemts for Roman Holiday ?

    At the time Lowry Digital Images restored Roman Holiday and Sunset Boulevard, it was reported the elements available was quite bad and a simple digital clean-up would not turn details and resolution better, until they found Lowry Digital technology. It was restored in very high resolution for the time, 2K I supose, since they said it could be print to 35mm. But now appears that such achievement it's not good enough, or something else, since they don't release Roman Holiday in blu ray.
    If they hadn't found better 35mm source for Roman Holiday, and Lowry Digital is no longer being hired by big USA studios for restoration, how could a new restoration looks better ?
     
  3. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Director
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    21,523
    Likes Received:
    11,052
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    I looked at my DVD last night (I reviewed it years ago; one of the last discs I covered as the Paramount DVD reviewer), and it looked acceptable to me upcoverted. One of the bonus features discussed how Lowry "degrained" the elements they were working from to come up with a finished product, and there was a smoothness to it that was probably DNR at work. But at least it didn't look shiny/waxy.

    Naturally I'd like a high definition Blu-ray, but I could live with this. It didn't stop me from enjoying the movie all over again.
     
  4. Alberto_D

    Alberto_D Banned
    BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    111
    I would like to know if there is today any system better than Lowry's system. They used to say that could remove a few generations of film duplication, in terms of recover lost details.
    If it was really such good, why it's no longer used?
     
  5. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    46,120
    Likes Received:
    21,876
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Too expensive is what I remembered.
     
  6. Alberto_D

    Alberto_D Banned
    BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    111
    It was about 14 years ago. Today one top computer worth for 6 computers in terms of processing power. He used about 500 computer, so today would be like use 83 computers.

    It's very sad that the only technology able to recover some details, instead of just sharpen images, it's no longer used in film restoration.

     
  7. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    46,120
    Likes Received:
    21,876
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    I did some more checking this morning. The iTunes extras are more robust than what Vudu has and the trailer is different and looks much better than the older Vudu trailer. Perhaps, the iTunes digital copy is derived from the latest restoration of Roman Holiday.

    Either way, I saw this in a movie theater in the past year or so. Therefore, I'm going to live with my 2002 DVD until a Blu-ray is released and I think it's a good chance that might happen in 2018, to celebrate its 65th Anniversary.
     
    Tony Bensley likes this.
  8. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,380
    Likes Received:
    1,750
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    I found this article regarding Lowry digital.

    http://variety.com/2014/film/news/classics-and-cult-movies-restored-reliance-mediaworks-1201257457/

    It’s from 2014, read the article and note how it says they are ‘upconverting’ from standard definition masters, now I have seen some of these so called Blu Ray titles and they have a marginal increase in detail over their DVD counterparts, they look slightly better but they do not give the sense of what could be if they scanned the camera negatives.

    Unfortunately many will be completely unaware of this dubious practice, I call it dubious because to me it’s cheating, obviously some titles mentioned like The Third Man have been scanned at 4K.

    At least with UHD they provide the wider colour gamut and sometimes an HDR pass when they upscale from 2K.
     
  9. Dick

    Dick Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 1999
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    5,030
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Maine
    Real Name:
    Rick
    HATARI! is a horrible Blu-ray, and it was a Paramount Home Video release. Look to TRUE GRIT (1969) for an example of what HATARI! should look like. FUNNY FACE is better, but certainly not flawless.
     
  10. Message #70 of 89 Feb 18, 2020
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2020
    Cameron Yee

    Cameron Yee Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    12,147
    Likes Received:
    944
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Since 2006
    Real Name:
    Cameron Yee
    Seeing that the iTunes HD of Roman Holiday is only $7.99, I went ahead and bought it. Skipping through different scenes there appears to be some grain structure, but there's probably been some grain reduction, though not excessive. It looks pretty good for there not being an alternative on BD. I would compare it to the DVD, but there's such a significant difference in resolution (pixel dimensions) it's kind of no contest.

    What amazes me though (and makes me feels suspicious) is the iTunes .m4v is 4.55 GB and the file on DVD is 5.44 GB!

    I'd still like to have a physical disc, but in general the digital download is fine.
     
  11. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    18,023
    Likes Received:
    22,015
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    The DVD is encoded with MPEG2, which relatively speaking is not space efficient. The iTunes version is encoded with MPEG4, which can contain significantly more data in similar or smaller file sizes than MPEG2.

    If you encoded the same source file in MPEG2 and MPEG4, the MPEG2 would probably be five or six times bigger for the same quality.
     
    Cameron Yee likes this.
  12. Cameron Yee

    Cameron Yee Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    12,147
    Likes Received:
    944
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Since 2006
    Real Name:
    Cameron Yee
    I figured as much, but it still blows my mind. :D
     
    Josh Steinberg likes this.
  13. OliverK

    OliverK Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2000
    Messages:
    4,141
    Likes Received:
    2,068
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Please note that streaming usually gives better textures on itunes than downloads that apple like to give you with inferior bit rates in order to keep file sizes down. These days drive space is a very cheap commodity and it does not much sense to do that but as usual apple does not ask us, they just do it. I noticed this first when the downloaded version of a movie had noticeably less textures and film grain than the streamed version after I had downloaded it both to my PC and to my PS3. I then verified this with a number of other movies and since then have stopped downloads for good.
     
  14. Cameron Yee

    Cameron Yee Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    12,147
    Likes Received:
    944
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Since 2006
    Real Name:
    Cameron Yee
    I deleted my download and tried streaming it. It looked pretty bad. Maybe my internet speed is not up to snuff.
     
  15. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    46,120
    Likes Received:
    21,876
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    The last time I watched my iTunes digital of it, the video presentation looked fine.
     
  16. OliverK

    OliverK Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2000
    Messages:
    4,141
    Likes Received:
    2,068
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    That could be the reason. I got better quality from streaming than from downloads when I finally managed to get real 16 mbps of bandwidth- Woth less than that itunes may not give you maximum quality.
     
  17. Cameron Yee

    Cameron Yee Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    12,147
    Likes Received:
    944
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Since 2006
    Real Name:
    Cameron Yee
    Supposedly I got 88 Mbps.

    I guess I didn't give it enough time to resolve itself. Screen Shot 2020-02-20 at 10.33.15 PM.
     
  18. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    46,120
    Likes Received:
    21,876
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Cameron,

    By the way, what is bad about video presentation?
     
  19. Cameron Yee

    Cameron Yee Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    12,147
    Likes Received:
    944
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Since 2006
    Real Name:
    Cameron Yee
    It just looked very mushy, but I wasn't patient enough to let it stabilize and it looks fine. The interesting thing is when I look at the title info, it says the file is 3.59 GB, which is smaller than the download.

    Screen Shot 2020-02-20 at 10.40.23 PM.
     
  20. Mark-P

    Mark-P Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    4,931
    Likes Received:
    2,925
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Real Name:
    Mark Probst
    I think you might need to check your iTunes account settings and verify you have downloads set to 1080p. The default setting is 720p.
     

Share This Page