1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

New Star Trek series starring Patrick Stewart

Discussion in 'TV Shows' started by Nelson Au, Aug 4, 2018.

Tags:
  1. mattCR

    mattCR Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,887
    Likes Received:
    661
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Lee Summit, Missouri
    Real Name:
    Matt
    Yeah this looks fantastic.
     
  2. Adam Lenhardt

    Adam Lenhardt Director

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2001
    Messages:
    21,748
    Likes Received:
    7,001
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    What's interesting to me is that as much as she became humanized over the course of "Voyager", she feels two decades more humanized in that brief scene. Closer to other Jeri Ryan characters.

    They're probably acquaintances from the Borg survivors' support group.

    Yes. Before I was interested in the show because Patrick Stewart was back as Jean-Luc Picard. Now I'm interested in the story being told. So the trailer did its job.

    It appears the rumors about Brent Spiner were true. The de-aging effect, while not perfect, is better than I expected it would be.
     
    joshEH, Tino and Josh Steinberg like this.
  3. holtge

    holtge Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2018
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    374
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Idaho Falls, Idaho
    Real Name:
    Gordon Holt
    This really looks intriguing! Add me to the list of those who can't wait to see it!
     
  4. Message #264 of 317 Jul 20, 2019
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2019
    Tino

    Tino Executive Producer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    15,694
    Likes Received:
    7,720
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Metro NYC
    Real Name:
    Valentino
    It was so good It gave me chills.
     
    joshEH and Neil Middlemiss like this.
  5. Message #265 of 317 Jul 20, 2019
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2019
    joshEH

    joshEH Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    5,377
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Room 303, The Heart O' The City Hotel
    Real Name:
    Josh
    Purely by total cosmic coincidence, taken as I was walking through one of the terminals at Frankfurt International Airport in Germany just this morning...

    A580AB44-55ED-40C9-A3E7-FAD42A8B585D. A4567FA6-71DF-4793-B784-12DA09C335A2.
     
  6. Doug Wallen

    Doug Wallen Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2001
    Messages:
    7,767
    Likes Received:
    3,153
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Macon, Ga.
    Real Name:
    Doug
    Looks like it will be a good series, railer did the job it was supposed to do.
     
  7. Sam Favate

    Sam Favate Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    8,683
    Likes Received:
    3,867
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Sam Favate
    Trailer looks great. Apparently, Brent Spiner and Jonathan Del Arco joined Stewart on stage. They also said Jonathan Frakes and Marina Sirtis will make appearances on the show. (If four of the original cast members are involved, Michael Dorn, LeVar Burton and Gates McFadden can't be far behind.)

    One of the most pleasing parts of the trailer is that they seem to be righting the biggest wrong of Nemesis and are reviving Data.
     
    Philip Verdieck likes this.
  8. Bryan^H

    Bryan^H Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Messages:
    6,388
    Likes Received:
    3,233
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    I thought the same thing.
     
  9. Francois Caron

    Francois Caron Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 1997
    Messages:
    2,291
    Likes Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Real Name:
    François Caron
    I liked his death scene. Part of Data's goal of becoming more human was the possibility that he would die one day, and the way he died showed how his humanity very likely surpassed most other people's humanity.

    However, chances are he'll be very annoyed at being reactivated since that would mean he hasn't successfully "died" the last time he tried it! :D
     
    joshEH and Bryan^H like this.
  10. Nelson Au

    Nelson Au Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 1999
    Messages:
    14,865
    Likes Received:
    3,745
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Sam, I’m not going to get too excited that Data is really back.

    That shot of Data playing cards with Picard may be a Holodeck simulation. But it would be cool if Data’s memory engrams were successfully impressed onto B4.

    I like that the trailer showed a much more human Seven of Nine, maybe she goes by Annika now.
     
    Doug Wallen likes this.
  11. Bryan^H

    Bryan^H Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Messages:
    6,388
    Likes Received:
    3,233
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Without the addition of past characters this series would look much less attractive to me. In fact, the only reason I even got excited by the trailer was the presence of Data. And Jeri Ryan who is clearly a long way from 'Seven of Nine'.
     
  12. Rodney

    Rodney Screenwriter
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2001
    Messages:
    1,850
    Likes Received:
    1,387
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    That trailer makes me more interested than I was before, but not enough to subscribe.

    I liked the board that said " THIS FACILITY HAS GONE _5843_ DAYS WITHOUT AN ASSIMILATION"

    16 years? Any relevance to that?
     
    Bryan^H likes this.
  13. Sam Favate

    Sam Favate Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    8,683
    Likes Received:
    3,867
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Sam Favate
    I pretty much despised every frame of Nemesis. Anything they can do to undo that movie, I will support. I hated that Data died. It seemed so pointless. Like they were saying "We're ending the TNG films, so let's kill off a beloved character." I really hate that sort of thing.

    Nelson, I do concede that Data and the cards could well be a holodeck thing. Maybe the restoration of Data is the goal of the show. I did wonder if the body parts could be Data, rescued from the wreckage. Why would B4 be disassembled?

    Jeri Ryan looked terrific. For one thing, she always looked better with her hair down, and not so severe in that bun. For another, it is wonderful that she is wearing real clothes and not those absurd catsuits. And Jonathan Del Arco is back! How cool is that?

    Can't wait to see Frakes and Sirtis in costume too. Both actors tweeted their involvement today. It seems Frakes was supposed to be there but had a cancelled flight or something.

    I continue to believe we will see Burton, Dorn and McFadden, and maybe even Wheaton and Goldberg.
     
    Philip Verdieck and Bryan^H like this.
  14. Bryan^H

    Bryan^H Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Messages:
    6,388
    Likes Received:
    3,233
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Big spoilers for sure.


    And there will probably be a year and a half to two year wait between the following season I'm sure.
     
  15. Jason_V

    Jason_V Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 7, 2001
    Messages:
    6,947
    Likes Received:
    2,052
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Bothell, WA
    Real Name:
    Jason
    Totally didn't expect all the familiar faces to pop up in the trailer, but it did confirm what I've been saying all along: by placing this show in the future, it opens up anyone and everyone from TNG/DS9/VOY to pop up to make an appearance. We have Seven (Voy), Data/B4 (TNG) and Riker and Troi (TNG) so far. It stands to reason everyone else will pop up, including Guinan. She'd be a natural with the story apparently dealing with the Borg.

    Pretty excited about this now and I can start to see the Trek gameplan for CBS All Access in 2020. The new Short Treks roll out in the fall, maybe Thanksgiving through Christmas 2019. Picard debuts in January and runs through mid-March. After a little hiatus, Discovery takes over from there, going through the summer/early fall. And then Lower Decks picks up at the end of the year.

    That gives the network Trek through the entire year to promote and keep people watching. I'm impressed right now with what we've seen and, based on Discovery Season 2, I'm happy with the people running these shows.
     
  16. Message #276 of 317 Jul 22, 2019
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2019
    Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    15,867
    Likes Received:
    18,480
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    I'm not in love with the delay from 2019 to 2020, but the pragmatist in me is aware that in terms of my personal scheduling, early next year will be more convenient for me than late this year. So while I'm not ready to send out a "thank you for delaying" telegram, it's probably gonna work out better for me this way.

    Hopefully starting the show in 2020 after the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays have ended will allow them to roll-out all episodes without a lengthy mid-season hiatus like Discovery had in season one. I much preferred the Discovery season two model where they didn't take any weeks off once the season began.

    One thing I want to add to this post: I've seen a bunch of similar comments both regarding this show and The Orville and the fact that they're on streaming platforms vs. linear ad-supported broadcast on a free network, both on HTF and around the internet. I'm seeing tons of comments with people expressing interest in the show while also stating upfront their refusal to consider paying for it. Those comments just reinforce my oft-stated belief that the biggest hurdle that content producers face today and in the years to come is not getting people interested in their content, but rather, getting people to pay for the content that they consume. There are so many people who have been waiting for a show like this for so long - both fans of TNG specifically and Trek fans in general eager to see what the Star Trek universe looks like post-Nemesis - and yet, I'm seeing what I consider to be a disturbingly high number of "not interested unless it comes in my first choice of distribution methods and price" comments being made in reference to both shows. And, for what it's worth, I just want to point out that while people shouldn't pay for stuff they're not interested in, if you're interested in Picard but not watching it because you believe it should be on a free network and not streaming - the message the studio will take from your not watching isn't that they should move it to a broadcast channel. The message the will take is, "There aren't as many people interested in this as we thought, and without a viable audience, we can't continue to produce new episodes."

    For years, we've begged CBS and Paramount to treat Trek with respect. It's finally happening. New Trek content is being made and the showrunners are being given access to premium budgeting normally reserved for prestige channels like HBO and shows like "Game of Thrones," and the showrunners are being granted the freedom to make the best shows they can make without the time constraints that held them back in the past. This seems like a very good thing to me. While I personally miss the old model of TV shows being totally free and producing 20-30 new episodes per year, that method of production and style of distribution is ending and not coming back. I'm glad that the people making Trek aren't trying to make a show for a media landscape that no longer exists, but rather, making the show in a way that will allow the show to be successful on today's terms. The more these shows succeed in capturing a paying audience, the more we'll get. And frankly, there are few things I enjoy more than Star Trek. If I can pay almost $30 for a single movie ticket to see the latest Marvel movie, it doesn't seem unreasonable that I'm being asked to pay about $6 a month (or about $18 over the course of a season of a new Trek show) to get what's in essence a 10 or 15 hour movie.
     
    Jason_V, Craig S, Sam Favate and 2 others like this.
  17. Sam Favate

    Sam Favate Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    8,683
    Likes Received:
    3,867
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Sam Favate
    This is just the beginning. Going forward, most if not all quality shows will be on for-pay streaming services. This is the death of cable, and the beginning of something else.
     
  18. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    15,867
    Likes Received:
    18,480
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    Probably broadcast too for prerecorded programming.

    If I was an advertiser choosing where to spend my ad dollars, I’d be wary of spending them on television advertising for anything other than a live event. As a consumer, there’s zero incentive for me to watch a filmed program the moment it’s broadcast - I’ll just have to sit through commercials I don’t want to see. Meanwhile, it’s ridiculously easy to DVR a program and start watching it moments after it begins so that you can skip commercials. The moment that capability became widespread is the moment TV advertising lost its value. It’s just taken them a while to realize it. Networks already know it, which is why they’re so quick to the chopping block if something doesn’t instantly do numbers from an era that’s not relevant to how we consume media today.

    But on the plus side, shows like Star Trek and The Orville would simply be canceled in years past, never mind that a good if not earth shattering number of viewers love those shows. Now, in today’s landscape, we get to vote directly with our dollars. That may seem less advantageous at first, until you realize that the streaming outlets don’t need to match broadcast ratings from 1987 for something to be viable. It just means that we have to pay for it.

    And if that’s the case, there’s nothing I’m happier to pay for than Star Trek.
     
    Sam Favate, joshEH and Doug Wallen like this.
  19. Doug Wallen

    Doug Wallen Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2001
    Messages:
    7,767
    Likes Received:
    3,153
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Macon, Ga.
    Real Name:
    Doug
    I was initially against paying what I consider extra for just one show (ST: Discovery). Discovery's first season was viewed on the bluray set, the show was tolerable and the hints for season 2 with the appearance of Enterprise and the casting of Capt. Pike enticed me to sign up for All Access. As the season progressed, the show grew on me and the reality of a Picard show, the short treks as well as the over hyped Twilight Zone (sure hope season 2 is better ;)) encouraged me to keep it.

    $6 is not much and there are many "classic" older series available that I have enjoyed revisiting. Our family dropped cable tv and only have cable internet. We are using Hulu, Netflix, CBS all access, Tubi (like a free Netflix = commercials), Pluto (specific genre channels) and in the fall will use Sling Orange (wife is a hockey fan). I find the cost of these services less than our former cable bill and a benefit to us. I don't mind paying for what I want to watch. As it stands, I only turn on the tv when I want to watch something, it is not on just to be on. It has been refreshing to be able to sit down when I want and watch content I prefer when I want (since streaming allows me the freedom to set my own schedule of viewing). I say bring on better stories, shorter seasons and year round Trek (makes this original fan very happy!!!). Worth the investment.
     
    joshEH and Josh Steinberg like this.
  20. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    15,867
    Likes Received:
    18,480
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    CBS All Access also makes it easy to cancel and resubscribe, so I just join when they have something I want, and then cancel when it’s over, and resubscribe when something else I want pops up. I like it. I pay for what I want to see and then don’t pay when I’m not using it.
     
    Doug Wallen likes this.

Share This Page