Paul_D
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2001
- Messages
- 2,048
I was on my way home last night and I saw someone walking along with their cat on a leesh, trotting along behind him. Why? Anyone here ever do it?
A cat's idea of a walk is to roll around on the sidewalk a bit, sniff some interesting smells, blink at the sun, investigate things of interest to cats, and so on while you stand there like some big dumb lump of a primate and watch the cat. Eventually, you get tired, pick up the cat, and go back inside.Now, that's the second-funniest thing I've read at HTF all day long.
Anybody here see the wonderful 1974 Paul Mazursky film Harry & Tonto? The opening shot is of the marmalade tabby ("Tonto") walking, with Art Carney ("Harry") holding onto him via a leash.
I don't like anything that makes a cat seem like a "pet," so leashes don't appeal to me. But when it comes to protection--cats have notoriously bad streetcrossing habits--I'm all for it. But since I live in an urban neighborhood, my little buddy Attila stays indoors a hundred percent of the time.
I value my skin, noLOL, agreed. I don't think my roommates cat, Mr. Kitty, would be very fond of being taken outside for a walk. He does occasionally like to come outside in the backyard but only a few feet away from the door. Mr. Kitty is more into enjoying the outdoor breeze and sunlight through a screened in window than actually being outside.
Except one doesn't "own" a cat.Your opinion. Legally, of course, you're wrong. I can go down to the store, buy a cat, and do whatever I want with it (short of harming it). It's mine. I own it.
However, "spiritually" (not sure how else to phrase it), you're right. You really don't "own" animals, as all animals have free will and make their own decisions. Especially cats. If you think about it hard enough, we actually "enslave" our animals. One might substitute the word "caregiver" if the animal loves you and would choose to be in your company, but since the animal does not get a choice, "slavery" or "captivity" would be a more accurate assessment of the animal's situation.
Of course, I have no problem with this. I own (enslave?) a dog, love her very much and spoil her rotten.
since the animal does not get a choice, "slavery" or "captivity" would be a more accurate assessment of the animal's situation.Interesting point, but lets not give anyone from PETA any ideas. I like having pets.