1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. We will be interviewing Criterion soon. Click here for details on how you can submit a question for us to ask.
    Dismiss Notice

The Shining (1980) 4K

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Bryan^H, Mar 16, 2019.

Tags:
  1. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    40,662
    Likes Received:
    16,215
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Tino likes this.
  2. Paul_Warren

    Paul_Warren Second Unit

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    480
    Likes Received:
    139
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Location:
    London, England
    Real Name:
    Paul Warren
    Having Leon Vitali involved is good enough for me. He ensured 2001 was done properly so I have no doubt Leon & the Kubrick estate will ensure The Shining is about as good as it can be on 4K:thumbsup:
     
    dpippel, PMF, titch and 1 other person like this.
  3. Will*B

    Will*B Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    564
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Location:
    London, England
    Real Name:
    Will
    This is great news - can't wait to see the results.

    I very much hope both cuts are on this release. Alternatively of course, I'll just have to buy the US and UK releases separately, just as I did with the BD!
     
  4. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    19,916
    Likes Received:
    9,185
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    I do think that the cover art is very imaginative and gripping, capturing the tone of the movie wonderfully and bringing back some vivid memories. I'll be looking forward to reviews of this before I consider buying, however.
     
    PMF likes this.
  5. English Patient

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2014
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    Joseph
    The Warner press release makes it sound like the new version will include the 'lost' 2-minute hospital scene that was cut from the film in the few days following its initial premiere (the US home video release has always been 144 minutes):

    The 4K remastering is of Kubrick’s original 146 minute version of the film which premiered in the United States on May 23rd, 1980.

    If this is really accurate, I'm surprised Warner's isn't making the inclusion of the lost footage more prominent, with words like "rarely seen lost ending," "new footage," or something similar.
     
  6. Paul Rossen

    Paul Rossen Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    908
    Likes Received:
    373
    Trophy Points:
    610

    I've never heard that the original ending was 'lost'. It was deleted by Kubrick and WB a day or two after the opening of the film. I saw it twice and it didn't leave any lasting impression. It would be 'great' if the new release had all three versions...but if it is going to be the one version then let it be the original release.
     
  7. EnricoE

    EnricoE Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    110
    God Dammit Warner: ADD THE ORIGINAL MONO!!!!

    No Mono = No Buy!!!
     
  8. Reggie W

    Reggie W Producer

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Messages:
    5,255
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Agua Verde
    Real Name:
    Pike Bishop
    I sincerely doubt they would reinstate the hospital scene. The hard rule with Kubrick films is they are not to be altered from how he left them. Until there is nobody left around to uphold that rule I don't think they will stray from it.
     
  9. Message #29 of 74 May 16, 2019 at 9:55 AM
    Last edited: May 16, 2019 at 1:17 PM
    PMF

    PMF Producer

    Joined:
    May 6, 2015
    Messages:
    3,730
    Likes Received:
    3,866
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Philip
    As with Barry Lyndon, I am confident that through Mr. Vitali we will "receive satisfaction".:thumbs-up-smiley:
     
  10. Paul Rossen

    Paul Rossen Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    908
    Likes Received:
    373
    Trophy Points:
    610

    And through Mr. Vitali we will be getting the version that Stanley Kubrick would have given us.
     
    PMF likes this.
  11. Vincent_P

    Vincent_P Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,032
    Likes Received:
    412
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    The listed running time and press release would indicate that it WILL include the coda, though. Why else point out the 146-minute running time and specifically say it's the "premiere" version otherwise? The Kubrick powers-that-be have changed their minds before, from first claiming that Kubrick wanted his "flat" films all presented in open-matte 1.33:1, to insisting that 1.77:1 was the proper aspect ratio for BARRY LYNDON for a time.

    Vincent
     
  12. owen35

    owen35 Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Real Name:
    Steve
    Yeah, I'm very much confused by this. It seems to me, given what Kubrick has said about that ending, that it would never been shown because he specifically removed it and never approved a release with it. This would go against his wishes. While I'm very excited to see it again (I saw the film opening night), I'm disappointed that they are not respecting his wishes--especially Spielberg who you would think would not support such a clear disrespect of the filmmaker's wishes.
     
  13. AcesHighStudios

    AcesHighStudios Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2018
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Real Name:
    Mike Williams
    What is Spielberg's connection to this release?
     
  14. Billy Batson

    Billy Batson Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,100
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    London
    Real Name:
    Alan
    Yes, but that hospital scene was in his original cut, I don't know why he removed it after the film had opened, maybe the audience reaction was not what he thought it would be. I'd think his wife, Christiane Kubrick & assistant, Leon Vitali would know. Saying that, I'd be surprised to see it back in. I'm looking forward to seeing the longer US version, as I've only seen the shorter UK cut.
     
  15. Peter Apruzzese

    Peter Apruzzese Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 1999
    Messages:
    3,999
    Likes Received:
    1,886
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Peter Apruzzese
    It was removed after the first day in most locations (it was supposed to be removed prior to that, but WB couldn't get to every location). The chief projectionist at a theater I worked at (a few years later) that premiered it with the scene the first day told me that WB sent an editor opening night after the late show and he physically spliced out the scene and took the footage with him. A replacement reel without the splice arrived a few days later.
     
    Josh Steinberg and PMF like this.
  16. dpippel

    dpippel HTF Premium Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2000
    Messages:
    7,686
    Likes Received:
    4,294
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems
    Real Name:
    Doug
    Sounds like a quintessential Kubrick decision! :) I'd love to see the scene included as an extra, but if he didn't want it in the finished film I have no interest in seeing it tacked on in this release.
     
    PMF likes this.
  17. Vincent_P

    Vincent_P Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,032
    Likes Received:
    412
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Peter Apruzzese likes this.
  18. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    15,048
    Likes Received:
    17,402
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    I genuinely believe the when Warner says it’s the premiere version, what they’re actually trying to convey is that it’s the longer US cut and not the shorter UK cut. But I can completely understand the confusion.

    Much like the 20 minutes trimmed from “2001” after its premiere, I don’t expect to see this footage on disc either. I really wish we could get them as bonus features but it’s not a dealbreaker for me.

    My hope is also that Warner will upgrade the BD version as well with the new master, as they also did for 2001.
     
    Mark_TB likes this.
  19. English Patient

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2014
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    10
    Real Name:
    Joseph
    'Lost' isn't the correct word - 'rarely seen' would be more accurate. But the overall point is that Warner seems to be indicating that this will be 2 minutes longer than all the existing US home video releases... but if it does indeed have footage that's never before been available in a US home video release, it seems odd that they wouldn't trumpet that fact. At least include words like "never before seen on home video" or something to that effect. For most movies, the addition of newly reinstated footage wouldn't be that big of a deal, but Kubrick seems to be in a rarefied class where this would be a huge deal. Even if the scene is ultimately pretty forgettable, its mere inclusion would be an excellent marketing hook.

    I tend to think this is just a marketing mix-up - I agree with the people on this forum that Kubrick was pretty clear about what versions he wanted in the public domain, so it would surprise me if the hospital scene is included. I work in a company where sometimes the marketing department and the content department aren't on the same page, so it isn't unusual for press releases to be inaccurate.
     
  20. owen35

    owen35 Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Real Name:
    Steve
    I seem to recall Kubrick's daughter speaking about it on a podcast recently. The decision to remove was because Kubrick felt the ending muddied up the film, adding an additional layer of supernatural (Danny's ball rolling into the hospital room) that took away from the film's overall meaning. I also do recall that in the original cut, we went from Jack frozen in the snow, then transitioned into the hospital room for that scene, and then finally dissolved to the photo on the wall. Adding the hospital scene greatly diminished the impact of the photo's immediate connection to Jack; another reason for the excising of that scene. Granted, I'm going off of very old memories, but it was the correct decision to make.
     

Share This Page