Edward Schatz
Second Unit
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2003
- Messages
- 415
117 minutes would seem too short for a Final Cut
Especially since the film is already 117 minutes long! Since the new disc runs 1:57:30, that means Ridley added less than 30 seconds to the new cut! That seems really odd, since he has insisted for the longest time that his ideal cut was far different from the other versions and the bonus discs boast "over 90 minutes" of deleted/extended scenes.Edward Schatz said:117 minutes would seem too short for a Final Cut
The previous "director's cut" is the shortest of any cuts of Blade Runner. There is no reason to expect that the final cut will be significantly longer than any other cut -- consider that it is likely to have no narration, and the sequences in the '92 "director's cut" where the narration was previously are far too long and still cut to the beat of the removed narration.Stephen_J_H said:That, of course is relying on the potentially erroneous assmption that the Final Cut does not substitute alternate takes or substantially alter the cut.
I'm not much of a Blade Runner buff, but I also remember Scott saying that he shortened a number of FX shots and quickened the pace slightly for his Alien: Director's Cut. Not sure if that's what he's done here, but it would help to explain why we're not seeing a lot of time added overall.Edward Schatz said:117 minutes would seem too short for a Final Cut
Does Amazon honor that price if you order now but they raise the price later?Randy Torres said:Amazon has the 5 disc Collectors Edition on presale for $54.99
http://www.amazon.com/Blade-Runner-F...5541512&sr=8-3
Thank you! I'm not one to own elaborate dvd sets but that workprint disc is too enticing to pass up.Randy Torres said:Amazon has the 5 disc Collectors Edition on presale for $54.99
I saw the so-called "workprint" in 70mm at the Cinerama Dome in LA several years back, and don't recall any "raw splices." My immediate reaction was that this was certainly not a workprint in the traditional sense (a one-light print used for cutting and splicing and for projection during the editing process.)mike kaminski said:35mmscreener); the digital bits says its "remastered" so maybe they have gone back to the source and gotten a cleaner version--i actually hope they haven't tidied up all the splices and technical flaws, that's sort of part of the appeal of watching a work-in-progress version.
Not just clips of BLADE RUNNER, but clips of BLADE RUNNER: THE FINAL CUT, including the new version of Deckard's unicorn vision!TheBat said:some clips from blade runner and preview of the documentary with cast and crew.
Jacob
http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/180003...qsRflsq8tfVXcA
Interesting clip of a Gaff scene there! Never seen it myselfVincent_P said:, including the new version of Deckard's unicorn vision!
Vincent