- Joined
- Dec 21, 2002
- Messages
- 24,648
- Real Name
- Jake Lipson
Means nothing. Actors regularly sign up for sequels that never get made.
And this is standard practice at Lucasfilm. Felicity Jones had a sequel option in her contract, and they killed her at the end of her movie.
Of course they signed Ehrenreich for another one -- if Solo had been a smash and they hadn't, he would've had all the power in negotiation. I think the end of the movie clearly sets up a sequel with the appearance of you-know-who and the implication that Han will go meet Jabba the Hutt. They expected to do one in success. However, there's no way that they're going to make one now. Solo lost money. To make another one would be the equivalent of setting a pile of money on fire, and the last time I checked, Kathleen Kennedy isn't the Joker. The plot points dangling at the end of Solo will just dangle. The focus at Lucasfilm going forward after Episode IX seems to be on the new trilogies from Rian Johnson and the Game of Thrones guys. New things, new characters, new stores. Solo isn't that.
The reported budget includes every cost involved in the movie.
Nope. Not by a long shot. The film's production budget is one thing and its marketing budget is another thing. Plus, movies frequently go over budget, as Solo certainly did. Also, you're assuming that the studio will report the budgets accurately, which is often not the case.