Instead of making articles about making lists of which films aren't on DVD, why not make an article about the benefits of going multi-regional? Oh, wait, nevermind. The newspaper is called "USA" Today... There are far more films on DVD released in other Regions, especially in NTSC display format, which are anamorphic and with extras to boot. But due to the narrowmindedness of many of the average consumer, they'll never know there're alternative solutions and options for various films. I'm just wasting my breath and time even suggesting and beneficial type thing which is going multi-region. There's practically an entire planet filled with DVD's to purchase and why be limited to only one region when you could have it all? Well, depending on the price and what's available.
On a visit to Australia earlier this year I spent some time browsing the video shops and rental stores. I was surprised by the number of NTSC DVDs available [dual-format players/TVs are common] and the number of multiregion and region-free releases. These were actual studio releases, not boots. I brought back a few titles I hadn't seen in the US and was surprised by their compatibility with R1 region code players. It makes me wonder whether the NA market is the only one where region-coded releases are the norm.
Tim where are you getting that info at? last list i looked at, sony was the major hold out on hammer horror, if it is MGM then they need to release some more midnight movies