JWC1969
Stunt Coordinator
IMHO, it's not your TV and it's not you. I really think Mr. Mann did a disservice to this film by gutting the color saturation and making it so dim. To me, at least, LA screams vibrancy and color. (Which was how the film was originally graded. Well, at least way more vibrant and colorful than this pass.) The film as it is now, in 4K HDR, looks like it was filmed in Nome, Alaska in the dead of winter. For the first time in my life, I've tucked away the 4K version and even the 1080p version that came out a couple years ago based on a 4K scan and have gone back to my original WB blu-ray, which, despite losing resolution (and based on an older scan), to my eyes looks much more palatable and the way I remember it from the version I saw in the theater in December 1995. And yes, I know Mr. Mann has more knowledge of cinema and the art of cinematography and color grading in his little finger than I have in my whole body but, again, I'm not a fan of his choices here.Hm... this disc has gotten enough great reviews for me to conclude I need to do more tinkering with my TV (LG OLED G2 77-inch), because to my eye this UHD disc is so dim it's unpleasant to watch and I'm squinting just to try to make out the actor's facial expressions during night scenes. Admittedly I've been mostly peeking at various scenes rather than watching the whole film yet, so maybe it's also partly a matter of letting your eyes get used to it?
I'm in a nearly pitch-black room, I'm in Cinema mode (with Filmmaker Mode on). OLED pixel brightness at 90 or above, contrast at 85, black level at 50, Energy Saver is off, AI brightness nonsense is off. And yet, the included blu-ray looks like a much better and more film-like image. I can see that the UHD is sharper in the areas that are bright enough to see, but it's overall just a misery to look at. Clearly I'm going to have to consider hiring someone to calibrate my TV, but other UHD discs that I own look fine to me. I know it's all very subjective.