Sorry, I was dashing around getting ready to head to the airportReviews have been good, I was looking for more direct connected device than a nas I can still return it tell me why ?
That enclosure seems to me the solution for someone doing digital media production: RAID 0 for super fast, high capacity scratch drive, and then three individual drives for large stores of digital media assets or whatever is used for such work.
For an HTPC, you want a straightforward RAID type system. Three or more drives running in RAID 3, 5, or 6 configuration giving resiliency and recovery opportunity to failure of at least one drive in the ensemble. It’s also preferable to use a RAID variant (e.g RAID 5) that allows storage to grow with mismatched drive sizes.
Something like this (not specifically saying to buy this, but this is the sort of device that has the features I’m describing)
https://www.synology.com/en-us/products/DS418j
I don’t recommend a simple spanned volume as the loss of a single drive destroys half to all of the data depending on how the data is stored. It took me like three or more months, spending weekends and a few hours every evening, to rip, name, edit metadata, and populate my library. I never want to do that again. It’s too much data to have a compete backup of. But I can afford to have RAID-like resiliency to have some hope of surviving a drive failure.
If you can spare the time to re-rip all your media again more easily than you can spare the money for extra drive(s) and RAID hardware, then skip the raid. Or if you will have a compete separate backup, then a simple spanned volume might be preferable to you.
If you’re an enthusiast, you can build your own RAID built around software like flexraid, freenas, or snapraid. (I’m not familiar with Mac software for RAID builds.)
Hope that helps.
Last edited: