What's new

Will we ever see restorations of the original 35mm prints of Disney animation classics? (1 Viewer)

Vahan_Nisanain

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
969
Location
Glendale, California
Real Name
Vahan_Nisanain
Konstantinos said:
I'd like to bump this thread to show a comparison between an exquisite HDTV version of Lady and the Tramp and the Bluray.

Well, unfortunately the HDTV is cropped, but you can see the extensive changes made on the Bluray.

Even lines are disappearing (notice the lines in Lady's legs) or others are accented (Tramp's lines)!

How natural does the HDTV look and how in harmony seem the characters with the background without standing out as on the Bluray.


http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/109823

Even with the cropping, the HDTV version IS how the film should look like.


Shame on you, Disney!
 

Dick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 22, 1999
Messages
9,937
Real Name
Rick
bigshot said:
Not until Lassiter gets replaced. He's the one calling the shots on how the blu-ray restorations should look.
I give great credit to Lassiter for having gone ahead with PRINCESS AND THE FROG after the studio had pretty much disengaged from cel animation, but I also have to admonish him somewhat for giving up after that, despite the fact that PATF did decent box office and produced a fair profit. It just didn't produce a LION-KING-like profit, which no doubt led to CEO's to put pressure on him to stop cel animation in favor of CGI. He caved. That was that. End of Disney cel animation for the most part. A grand cinema tradition cut off at the knees.
 

Konstantinos

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
2,786
Real Name
Konstantinos
I would be really interested in the opinion of Mr. Harris too.

Mr. Harris what do you think is the best way to release an animation film on Bluray?

Should the grain be left intact (as eg. in the Gulliver's Travels Bluray by Thunderbean) or they should be degrained, rotoscoped and repainted (I'm not sure what is exactly the procedure) as in Disney?
 

Konstantinos

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
2,786
Real Name
Konstantinos
Vahan_Nisanain said:
I'm not Mr. Harris, but of course the grain should be left in! It is part of the film!


Without grain, film looks all waxy and wooden!
Well, some people argue that the animation films weren't supposed to have grain and so it's better to see them as they were painted originally.

But the thing I love too in these grainy versions is that you can see every brush stroke in the paints which changes in every frame, and that gives it life. In the degrained Bluray this effect is vanished, because they have repainted it on top.


See also here a screenshot i found on the net between 35mm and Bluray!

I can't believe the change of grey color to purple, to match the current pop trends!

How is the Bluray true to the original look?



RlnrFNT.jpg
 

Raul Marquez

Supporting Actor
Joined
Apr 2, 2002
Messages
721
Location
San Juan, Puerto Rico (USA)
Real Name
Raul H. Marquez, MD
Raul Marquez said:
Well, some people argue that the animation films weren't supposed to have grain and so it's better to see them as they were painted originally.
But the thing I love too in these grainy versions is that you can see every brush stroke in the paints which changes in every frame, and that gives it life. In the degrained Bluray this effect is vanished, because they have repainted it on top.

See also here a screenshot i found oeen 35mm and Bluray!
Konstantinos said:
Well, some people argue that the animation films weren't supposed to have grain and so it's better to see them as they were painted originally.

But the thing I love too in these grainy versions is that you can see every brush stroke in the paints which changes in every frame, and that gives it life. In the degrained Bluray this effect is vanished, because they have repainted it on top.


See also here a screenshot i found on the net between 35mm and Bluray!

I can't believe the change of grey color to purple, to match the current pop trends!

How is the Bluray true to the original look?



RlnrFNT.jpg

I for one feel that the post on the left with the grey dress looks more natural and pleasing to the eye.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,424
Real Name
Robert Harris
If new prints were made today, they would look absolutely nothing like original prints


I believe they would be quite unpleasant to the eye.


RAH
 

Konstantinos

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
2,786
Real Name
Konstantinos
Robert Harris said:
If new prints were made today, they would look absolutely nothing like original prints


I believe they would be quite unpleasant to the eye.


RAH
I'm sorry, i didn't understand what you meant (or implied).

Are you by any chance suggesting that the original color of the dress was indeed purple and that the initial transfer to film couldn't replicate that color?



And what do you feel is the best way to approach a restoration on animation films?
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,424
Real Name
Robert Harris

Konstantinos

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
2,786
Real Name
Konstantinos
Robert Harris said:
Must disagree. Was never meant to be represented by tiny still frames on my phone
I'm sorry?

Well, these are 1080p resolution screenshots for anyone that is a member in that forum.

For anyone else they are 720p.

Maybe you should see them on a desktop computer with a larger screen?
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
7,898
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
You will find that screenshots are highly controversial around here, as most of us prefer to see the film in motion to see how grain is represented.
 

Ronald Epstein

Founder
Owner
Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 1997
Messages
66,787
Real Name
Ronald Epstein
Stephen_J_H said:
You will find that screenshots are highly controversial around here, as most of us prefer to see the film in motion to see how grain is represented.

Well said.


More pre-release opinions have been wrong because they were

judged on a single screenshot.
 

Konstantinos

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
2,786
Real Name
Konstantinos
Oh, i see..

Well, even so, there might be small differences due to encoding and stuff, but the sure thing is that i don't think the grain will disappear once in motion.


I myself, have never seen a Bluray that in motion looks worse, or better than the screenshots that represent it.


But anyway, since you like, i'll comply with the "rules".

This is then how I believe an animation restoration should be:

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Fleischer-Classics-Featuring-Gullivers-Travels-Blu-ray/82468/#Screenshots

i own the Bluray and can tell you that it looks in motion like the screenshots.
 

Randy Korstick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2000
Messages
5,841
This is also true when judging open matte versus the original theatrical widescreen. Screen shots may show heads partially cut or some information missing in animated films when in reality the screenshot is less than 1 second of film and not noticeable when in motion.

Stephen_J_H said:
You will find that screenshots are highly controversial around here, as most of us prefer to see the film in motion to see how grain is represented.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,424
Real Name
Robert Harris
Konstantinos said:
Oh, i see..

Well, even so, there might be small differences due to encoding and stuff, but the sure thing is that i don't think the grain will disappear once in motion.


I myself, have never seen a Bluray that in motion looks worse, or better than the screenshots that represent it.


But anyway, since you like, i'll comply with the "rules".

This is then how I believe an animation restoration should be:

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Fleischer-Classics-Featuring-Gullivers-Travels-Blu-ray/82468/#Screenshots

i own the Bluray and can tell you that it looks in motion like the screenshots.

Unimpressive. FAR too contrasty, if one is to go by the frames.


The original negative would be essential to any restorative effort.


Why not use it?


RAH
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
7,898
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
I believe the reason Thunderbean used a dye transfer print was because it was all they had access to. Gulliver, of course is PD, with original negatives either with Universal or Paramount. I agree that it looks too contrasty, but it is still a vast improvement over Koch Video's smeary, completely degrained, squashed and cropped to fit 16:9 screens version. This is where we butt up against the question of how much studios value certain assets.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,061
Messages
5,129,861
Members
144,281
Latest member
papill6n
Recent bookmarks
0
Top