Speaking of waves, will you be able to attend the MWKTM event on 19 Nov?
Robert and Charles, thank you so much.I will absolutely be there, and I hope PMF responds in the affirmative.
Indeed, yes, and I shall.
An honor to accept.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Speaking of waves, will you be able to attend the MWKTM event on 19 Nov?
Robert and Charles, thank you so much.I will absolutely be there, and I hope PMF responds in the affirmative.
Your instincts are correct. Hundreds of hours went into clean-up, color and stabilization, with final work being performed at Roundabout.Mine arrived on Monday, but just had time to look at it tonight. It really is a treat to see a silent film in such a quality presentation. Long-time silent film buffs are used to seeing silent films on actual film, often contrasty copies of copies of prints , aside from the rare opportunities to see prints made from actual studio negatives. Digital tools have worked wonders cleaning up wear and tear, allowing us to see just how superb black-and-white photography had developed when you can actually see the subtleties in the frame as designed.
But to me , the unsung hero of digital restoration is image stabilization. It was not uncommon watching film prints of silents to see imperfections built in from the (often imperfect) source material with the picture occasionally jumping up and down or intertitles sometimes bouncing on the screen. I usually notice immediately when I see something that's been stabilised because the titles and such are just so rock-steady. I noticed the same thing on the Laurel and Hardy : Year One set. ( Now I am nervously fearing Mr. Harris will drop in and say no image stabilization was used, but I trust my instincts. And if it wasn't used, the results are even more impressive.)
Effects & score were quite impressive too. A great addition to my film library !
Very difficult without affecting the grain structure.I was only able to watch the first 10 minutes last night before an interruption forced me to stop, but I was blown away by what I saw. The picture looked fantastic and the story was pulling me in. Can't wait to revisit it - so happy to have this in my collection!
I do have a question - and this comes from curiosity, not a nick-pick or complaint of any kind: I did notice some vertical lines appearing here and there (which from recollection seems rather typical of older film) and was wondering if it is difficult to 'clean these up' with the various digital tools available...?
Thank you for the explanation!Very difficult without affecting the grain structure.
Thank you for being a part of the journey.Watched this tonight and thoroughly enjoyed it! Such a beautiful restoration. A big thank you to Robert Harris and all those who worked to bring this to fruition!
As far as I remember from the reissues of Vertigo and The Ten Commandments, SuperVistaVision was VistaVision blown up to 70. Have they done a blow-up of TMWKTM? Incidentally, I can hardly wait for the 4K Bluray next week.The new restoration of Hitchcock's The Man Who Knew Too Much in SuperVistaVision 4k and Perspecta audio.
Very different beasts. Like 4k, 70mm is merely a bucket for holding data. And aspect ratios are merely numbers.As far as I remember from the reissues of Vertigo and The Ten Commandments, SuperVistaVision was VistaVision blown up to 70. Have they done a blow-up of TMWKTM? Incidentally, I can hardly wait for the 4K Bluray next week.