Adam Lenhardt
Senior HTF Member
It's Chekhov's volcano kid.For example, seemingly the only reason they highlight the volcano kid at the start is so the story can loop back to him near the end to explain some volcano stuff.
It's Chekhov's volcano kid.For example, seemingly the only reason they highlight the volcano kid at the start is so the story can loop back to him near the end to explain some volcano stuff.
I’ve got a good friend who can’t do this. He almost gets pissed off. He watches a movie with a chip on his shoulder. He watches a movie to find fault with it. He hated Colossus the Forbin Project because he would not accept the movies premise and go with it. So he doesn’t like a lot of movies. I’m showing this JC’s The Thing this week. I told him, with a smile, if he picks this movie to death, I’m done with him. I know he won’t like the ending.
Actually, I think most people that stated they liked this movie aren't really saying it's so good, but rather they had a fun/enjoyable experience watching the movie.I try not to associate with people like that.
It's funny. I don't think this movie is either as good or as bad as most others here seem to think it is. It's exactly what it is. A silly Action/SciFi flick. Go with it or don't, but don't put too fine a line to the story.
See post 14, Dave explained it much better than I could.I still do not understand why it ended the way it did.If they prevented the future war from ever happening, why doesn’t the film end with Chris Pratt and his daughter back watching the football game at her party as everything resets?
Is your friend Jason V?
You can't think about it too hard, butI still do not understand why it ended the way it did.If they prevented the future war from ever happening, why doesn’t the film end with Chris Pratt and his daughter back watching the football game at her party as everything resets?
There are good, even great movies that require your brain to be turned off. Do you take the premise of JC’s “The Thing”, that a creature can completely morph into something different? That’s impossible. ST’s Transporter, that’s just not possible, but I’ll guess you accept them.Well that’s unfair Mark! I never go into a movie wanting to not like it. I mean, what’s the point in that? But I do like things to make sense. I don’t turn my brain off…not even when we’re watching Below Deck Mediterranean.
There are good, even great movies that require your brain to be turned off. Do you take the premise of JC’s “The Thing”, that a creature can completely morph into something different? That’s impossible. ST’s Transporter, that’s just not possible, but I’ll guess you accept them.
I never said, nor felt you did say that. There is nothing in science that implies the two examples are remotely possible. The Theory of Relativity says you can travel forward when nearing the spread of light. Actually time just slows down for the traveler. Science in no fashion accepts the flexible time travel in the movies. I know this and happily accept the premise of the Terminator movies.Accept those all you want because things go BOOM and sounds good on your stereo. Movies have to make sense and it rooted in reality for me. I never ever said they had to be for you.
You don’t always get to “choose” your friends. He’s a good friend and I like him. He’s the kind of friend I want to help.I try not to associate with people like that
Uh, no.Is your friend Jason V?
In my personal experience there are things that I consider truly impossible. I just don’t let them get in the way of enjoying the movie. Back and forth time travel, disassembly of matter, transmitting it, and reassembling of the matter. The last thing is akin to being a god. If a persons can be disassembled then the person can be reassembled in an “improved” form. I’m an atheist sod’s the idea is not sacrilegious to me, just impossible. Aliens visiting us, with vast distance involved, EXTREMELY unlikely.So you’re saying that just because we believe something right now there is no way that anything else comes down the pike to make us rethink the Theory of Relativity, for instance? I reject that notion because that’s the very essence of science: learn, evaluate and change, if needed. Just because humanity in 2021 believes time travel isn’t possible doesn’t mean it isn’t possible. It’s not possible today based on what we know. In 30 years, we may have a completely different stance.
Probably a good idea to actually see the thing you’re discussing so you can speak about it intelligently.None of these will stop me from enjoying a movie I otherwise like. I think I gotta watch the movie before before discussing it further.