LaMarcus
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2002
- Messages
- 1,619
- Real Name
- LaMarcus
Im having a real conflict within. I was so pumped to get a progressive scan DVD player from all the praise that I heard from various forums, reviews, etc. So I could hardly contain myself in the pursuit of obtaining one.
Finally the mission was accomplished when I purchase the Toshiba 3750 DVD player, in conjuction with my 65" 16x9 samsung tantus. And what I discovered in great horror (I might add) is that when I hit the button to go from progressive to interlaced the picture actually looked deeper and richer in color. This was horrifing! .
The tv is calibrated with VE and when the player sends out the progressive signal the picture looks like water color and when I do interlaced it looks like an oil painting? After messing with it more I discovered that when in prog. the picture was much brighter, and when in interl. it was darker. So when I darken the picture and added more color theres not much difference, but what gives?
Does my tv do a better job of deinterlaceing and coverting to progressive than the DVD player does?
Finally the mission was accomplished when I purchase the Toshiba 3750 DVD player, in conjuction with my 65" 16x9 samsung tantus. And what I discovered in great horror (I might add) is that when I hit the button to go from progressive to interlaced the picture actually looked deeper and richer in color. This was horrifing! .
The tv is calibrated with VE and when the player sends out the progressive signal the picture looks like water color and when I do interlaced it looks like an oil painting? After messing with it more I discovered that when in prog. the picture was much brighter, and when in interl. it was darker. So when I darken the picture and added more color theres not much difference, but what gives?
Does my tv do a better job of deinterlaceing and coverting to progressive than the DVD player does?