Scott Kriefall
Second Unit
Anyone else notice some very obvious, vertical blue lines in the "downbelow" scenes on episode 2 ("Soulhunter")?
I mentioned in an earlier post the S1 DVD transfer was bad on my DVD player and good on my PC. Then I noticed that the DVD player was switching from "video" mode to "film" mode very frequently. I took the player out of "auto" and forced it to video. This got rid of a lot of the pixelation and all of the combing effects that I saw.It seems to me that a lot of the reported "flaws" in this set (dirt and scratches aside) are player/monitor dependent. If switching his player from "auto" to "video" made nearly everything this fellow had spent another long post complaining about disappear, I have to wonder how "bad" the actual data on the discs really is.
All I can say is on my set they look gorgeous. The CGI is a tiny bit soft, and does show some aliasing from time to time but mostly it isn't noticable and I'm seeing plenty of detail in the exterior shots that I never saw on broadcast, tape or LD. Over all I'd give this set at least an 8 on a scale of 10, and hope the future sets are even better. I certainly don't understand what some of the reviewers were complaining about, or how fans can post threads saying that the discs look worse than VHS tapes - unless their setups are either showing flaws that mine doesn't, or introducing flaws that aren't there. I suppose if you watch the show on a 100" FPTV system it won't look as good. But one of the ways they brought the show in on half the budget of ST:TNG was by making things look "just good enough" for NTSC resolution and the average TV size. They took advantage of the fact that an FX shot or an alien makeup that was going to be watched on a 25" screen didn't have to look as good as it would in a feature film that was going to be projected on a 30 foot high theater screen. So there are limits to how much scrutiny some of this stuff can take - and they're just inherent in the source material, not a reflection of "poor quality" in the DVDs.
Regards,
Joe
This is pathetic, but it is expected from Warner, given the way they have handled B5.Right. Warner Bros. hates B5 so much that they bought substandard case deliberately, so that thousands of discs would be damaged, angry customers would return them to retailers and retailers in turn would get pissed off with Warner Home Video. This is exactly how business decisions are made in offices all over this country every day. Everybody knows that major corporations screw things up deliberately to offend their own customers, and that they make major business decisions based on emotional reactions to their own products.
Sheesh!
Regards,
Joe
Joe? Are you having a bad week?How'd you guess?
But seriously, I've read so many post in the past two weeks from people who seem to seriously believe that there is some kind of vast Warner Bros. conspiracy against B5 (the folks who only put up around $27 million each year to make the thing) that I had to vent a little. It doesn't help that most of these posts (and I'm not talking about the ones here) are from people who have no clue how the TV business, the home video business or any other business actually works. I can't believe that some of these people even have jobs, because even a burger flipper at McDonald's is going to pick up some idea about how business works after a couple of months on the job.
Regards,
Joe
anyway I watched disk #2 and found out that it was not the content it should be, instead it had the content from disk #4 (dispite the big #2 on the front of the DVD). I have checked all of the other DVD's and they are OK, but for some reason disk #2 has the same info on it as disk #4. So my big question is has anybody else had the same problem?I personally haven't experienced this, but I've read reports of this on other forums (like DVD Talk).
Two of my discs were loose in the packaging, disc 2 and 4. Disc 4 was scuffed pretty bad and wouldn't play after it got a ways into an episode. I just exchanged my set today and disc 2 of my newly exchanged set was loose. It didn't appear scuffed or scratched at all, so I'm hoping to watch it soon. The hubs in this packaging really suck. I'm quite happy with set otherwise, though.
And considering how many people seem to displike these folks, why are you ordering from themI had never dealt with them before, and they had the cheapest online price that I could find.
The worst part of all of this is that my discs are now weeks late and I could still run into the hub problem many others have (which is not TAU's fault of course).
Andy