Kramer Lowry
Second Unit
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2004
- Messages
- 389
- Real Name
- Kramer
quote:I never heard anything about this making of. Where did you get em?
quote:I hope they release this soon on Blu-Ray, with all the missing things from the Laserdisc and the German Versions,...
Well, I do not agree on Elm Street 5. Here is a comparison I have just done with the R1 DVD and the old LD.
As most of you all know, Elm Street 5 is cut on DVD. They only used a R-rated version that cut's out 1 min of pure gore, in 12 cuts.
You can watch the uncut scenes here: http://noes.aimoo.com/. on downloads. I do have the screenshots for all the cut gore but that are 50-60 images and I think it's easier to register and see on the link I gave.
But the problem don't stop there. I have compare the USA DVD and the old Image LD, also from USA. One have to wonder if the widescreen
matting is really right way to watch it?
(DVD vs LD):
[url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/2/23/htf_imgcache_2330.jpeg] [/url] [url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/1/1f/htf_imgcache_2331.jpeg] [/url]
Here he shows her the tickets that he have bought for them and they talk a little about them. But you don't see that on the DVD.
More places where the matting is maybe too tight?
[url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/b/b0/htf_imgcache_2332.jpeg] [/url] [url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/5/5f/htf_imgcache_2333.jpeg] [/url]
[url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/e/e8/htf_imgcache_2334.jpeg] [/url] [url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/c/c7/htf_imgcache_2335.jpeg] [/url]
There are a lot of places where I think the open matte version is the better one.
But it is even more! As you see on some of the pictures there is a big different in color and that is not constant! Both color and brighter/darker image changes all the time in both versions.
(DVD vs LD):
[url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/9/99/htf_imgcache_2336.jpeg] [/url] [url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/6/68/htf_imgcache_2337.jpeg] [/url]
Here the LD have a substantial more deep blue color, where the DVD is more neutral. In most cases, but not all, the LD do have a deeper color (blue/red).
What is right, I don't know. I prefer maybe 60-70% of the time the LD's color over the DVD, but some cases the DVD was way better.
More color difference (DVD vs LD):
[url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/0/0f/htf_imgcache_2338.jpeg] [/url] [url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/9/9c/htf_imgcache_2339.jpeg] [/url]
Here the DVD is much brighter and have a neutral color. The LD is much darker and have a greenish color. But in this case, I think the LD is right is we watch the scene right after this:
[url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/7/7e/htf_imgcache_2340.jpeg] [/url]
Here we see that the place she is coming from is green, even on the DVD.
More color differences (DVD vs LD):
[url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/1/1f/htf_imgcache_2341.jpeg] [/url] [url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/c/ca/htf_imgcache_2342.jpeg] [/url]
[url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/b/b1/htf_imgcache_2343.jpeg] [/url] [url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/4/43/htf_imgcache_2344.jpeg] [/url]
As you see, the color timing is not constant.
I have also found a audio misstake, I think. When they are breaking in to free Amanda Kreuger soul:
[url=https://static.hometheaterforum.com/imgrepo/9/9e/htf_imgcache_2345.jpeg] [/url]
She ask "Sister Amanda?" on the LD, but nothing on the DVD.
I also preferred the PCM track on the LD over the DD on the DVD. More dynamic and clearer.
So I hope for a new DVD (HD-DVD) release with the unrated version and maybe more of the LD's color timing in some cases (or a total redone transfer supervised by the DP). And I would prefer if I could choose to watch a open matte version.
That argument boils down to what's more important, directorial intent--the purist position--versus the "season to taste," viewer's preference way to go.
I've found I prefer watching these open matte--full screen--on my 27 inch television. [each of the Nightmare films is offered full screen on the 2nd layer of the single disc edition dvds, but the menus are tricky. One must select "play movie" from the main menu in order to select widescreen or fullscreen (if you try to play directly from any other menu, it defaults to widescreen)] They're just more immersive that way on a smaller screen. And, in those rare instances where the framing is way off--allowing parts of the image that were obviously intended to be covered--I simply do a mental matte job and ignore it.
Contrary to what the studios and some videophiles would have you believe, many full screen editions of 1.85:1 films are simply "open matte" transfers and result in more of the camera negative being exposed, not less.
If you're interested in the open matte Nightmares, seek out those signle disc editions. With each transfer accessible from the same side of the dvd, it's easy to do side-by-side comparison of the composition.
--Jack
It isn't about if you see more, it's about what is intended to be seen.
It's only about that if you're interested in watching the intended framing. If you're interested in watching the films open-matte, it's nice to have the full screen transfers.
I follow what you're saying. While not every DVD has the proper framing, an open matte is definitely not what is intended. I'd rather see something mis-framed than in the wrong aspect ratio.