One thing I haven’t seen mentioned is the differences in licenses that Criterion and Kino tend to acquire. Criterion typically licenses a title in perpetuity for the life of the format. They can afford to spend more on their releases because they have an unlimited amount of time in which to recoup their expenses.
The licensing deals that Kino is able to get are generally for fixed terms and limited periods of time. They may only have the rights to their Universal titles for a short period, probably not dissimilar from Twilight Time’s three year window. They simply can’t afford to spend the same amount of money on a release that they’re only able to sell for a couple years compared to a company that has decades to recoup an investment.
Universal owns the film, and as the owner, it’s Universal’s responsibility to ensure its proper preservation and release.
It really seems to me that any studio-related frustration should be directed at Universal, not Kino.
Very interesting. I'd still like to know what went on behind the scenes on the licensing negotiations here. Given Criterion's relationship with Lynch, I can't imagine that Criterion didn't bid on Lost Highway.