Konstantinos
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
- Messages
- 2,796
- Real Name
- Konstantinos
What would be the difference? I don't understand..If you saw a transfer at 30fps, you may change your mind.
What would be the difference? I don't understand..If you saw a transfer at 30fps, you may change your mind.
It would have helped if Mr Harris had spelt those out. We don’t all live in the film jargon/abbreviation/acronym world!
Because 30fps brings greater audience participation, a more dynamic picture.
That's why it was chosen.
Have you watched Oklahoma on BD ?
At 30fps ?
Actually, those have probably been explained fifty times in these here parts. We can make a sticky for film terms.It would have helped if Mr Harris had spelt those out. We don’t all live in the film jargon/abbreviation/acronym world!
The major attribute found at 30fps (frames per second) is the elimination of what is called “pIcket fencing,” a situation which, during a camera move, creates awkward visuals as 24fps is unable hold a normal image without breaking up.I am not quite sure if that would make it a better movie but it certainly is a better experience to see it in 30fps and also the experience that moviegoes were supposed to have.
30fps would have brought visible improvements to many movies with a relatively modest increase in film stock compared to other options like 48fps or 60fps so it is too bad that it did not become the new standard.
Nope.Have you watched Oklahoma on BD ?
At 30fps ?
Oh yes, I totally agree. For me, the films I saw in the late fifties & sixties (in the cinema & on TV) are the magical ones, they sort of seeped into my DNA, they don't all still have that magic, but a lot do (probably why I can't get exited about a WAC release that I've never seen). It's the same with music, Rubber Soul isn't the best Beatles album, but it's my favourite, warm memories of listening to the LP with my school mates.The interest or lack thereof,to any film is...what is your personal history with it? It's almost like reclaiming parts of your past memories, and sometimes it does trigger those fun memories snd is a good thing.
Nope.
If 30fps creates the "soap-opera" effect as we say it, then I don't like it.. (I remember seeing extracts of The Lord of the Rings in a shop which sold TVs, and the movement was weird. It was not filmic at all. I gathered that they had changed the frame rate)
If it doesn't , then I'm curious to see the difference.
Perhaps but I couldn’t recall those acronyms.Actually, those have probably been explained fifty times in these here parts. We can make a sticky for film terms.
Still a pretty good idea.Perhaps but I couldn’t recall those acronyms.
It's a more subtle smoothing of motion than you see in HFR productions. If you've ever seen PAL video at 25fps, it's just a smidge beyond that. Not jarring like frame interpolation but more like what you might see in the real world.Nope.
If 30fps creates the "soap-opera" effect as we say it, then I don't like it.. (I remember seeing extracts of The Lord of the Rings in a shop which sold TVs, and the movement was weird. It was not filmic at all. I gathered that they had changed the frame rate)
If it doesn't , then I'm curious to see the difference.
I do not really notice much of a difference between 24fps and 25fps, probably because it is only an increase of a bit more than 4%.It's a more subtle smoothing of motion than you see in HFR productions. If you've ever seen PAL video at 25fps, it's just a smidge beyond that. Not jarring like frame interpolation but more like what you might see in the real world.