What's new
Signup for GameFly to rent the newest 4k UHD movies!

IMO, the worst looking DVD I own is Star Wars Episode II (1 Viewer)

Alma

Agent
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
30
Its true. Do not have an extensive collection but Attack of the Clones looks very soft and muddy, almost blurry. Have heard this is one of the best, if not the best, DVD transfers out there. Have Gladiator, Fifth Element, Shrek and other great looking DVD's that look phenomenal on my HDTV Philips set and the Philips DVDQ50. Have not calibrated my TV but have used the AVIA and Video Essentials disks so DVD's and HDTV cable look very nice. Could it at all be possible the DVD is bad? It doesn't skip or pause/freeze at any point so I am not really sure what the issue can be. I'm almost tempted to purchase another copy just to see if it displays the same symptoms. Anyone care to take a stab at this?
 
Please support HTF by using one of these affiliate links when considering a purchase.

Charles J P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2000
Messages
2,049
Location
Omaha, NE
Real Name
CJ Paul
I heard that GL purposefully softened the movie because it was filmed digitally and he wanted to make it look more filmlike. Perhaps he was unable to achieve a realistic film "effect".
 

Alma

Agent
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
30
Not sure what all the hype is than. Looks really bad IMO.
Worst looking DVD I own.
 

Matt Stone

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2000
Messages
9,063
Real Name
Matt Stone
Worst looking DVD I own.
Than you probably must not own too many DVDs. :)

I know others have complained about the soft transfer before, but I doubt many of them would say it is the "wost looking DVD" ever.

BTW, this should be in the software forum, and we've had multiple discussions about it.
 

Carl Johnson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 6, 1999
Messages
2,260
Real Name
Carl III
"I test drove a Mercedes and it was the worst car I ever drove......."

I don't know what to say other than it must be nice....
 

Diallo B

Screenwriter
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
1,085
I agree with the initial poster. I was looking forward to the most pristine DVD experience ever when I purchased ATOC and I was dissapointed to say the least. In terms of the transfer, I can not say that it is the worst DVD that I have ever viewed as I have been collecting since 1998. However, it is definitely very soft when viewing on my 57" Toshiba.

The worst transfer I have ever seen FROM A MAJOR STUDIO was the first DVD release of Highlander.

I realize that this has probably been covered many times but for the sake of this thread I will state the following. Folks that have large progressive scan displays see so much more texture than the average viewer. I know that my HDTV has made me much more critical of anything on any televison HD or not.

The saving grace of the ATOC DVD was the audio. When I demo the Darth Sidious fight at the end of the movie my guests are always impressed. Some have even commented that they heard other HT's before and were not impressed until this demo. If not for the amazing mix I definitely would have been extremely dissapointed.
 

Gary->dee

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Messages
1,923
I don't think it's the worst looking DVD by far, but I think the transfer could have been better. I'm using my PS2 and a component cable hookup and during some darkly lit scenes, the fireplace scene in particular, I notice a lot of artifacting. I've seen Quicktime movies with better resolution than that particular scene. I've often wondered that since the movie was shot digitally, maybe it should have been spread over 2 discs to get the optimum picture clarity instead of putting the feature on one disc. That's my uneducated theory on the matter anyway. In some ways I think The Phantom Menace has better image quality.
 

Steve_Tk

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2002
Messages
2,833
Looks amazing on mine. Yeh it's soft, but have you seen some of these others movies transfers?

I mean Signs has some terrible video noise in numerous scenes. So does the phantom menance. AOTC has none of this.
 

Jeff Kleist

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 4, 1999
Messages
11,266
Gary, the problems you're seeing in the fireplace scene are from what I've seen mostly limitations of the cameras.
 

Gary->dee

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Messages
1,923
Well in that case that's the particular area in which digital cameras suck and I understand why certain filmmakers like Spielberg aren't going for it. I think the process involved in the actual making of movies on celluloid lends itself much better to filming dark scenes like that compared to the digital version. Chemicals are much more foregiving when it comes to low levels of light than digital bits.
 

Jason_Els

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 22, 2001
Messages
1,096
Worst DVD transfer I own of a recent movie that should look good is Scarface.

Best DVD transfer I own of a recent movie is a tie. Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring and Mystery Science Theater 3000: The Movie. Spiderman is no slouch either but it didn't make me marvel at the picture during any portion of it.

Now LOTR you could figure should be good. But given the general disdain MST3k: The Movie has been given (by non-fans) I was absolutely floored by how good it looked. Closest thing to hi-def I've ever seen on my HDTV.
 

Greg_S_H

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 9, 2001
Messages
15,846
Location
North Texas
Real Name
Greg
AOTC looks fantastic on a properly calibrated digital tube TV with a top end progressive scan player. Amongst the best I've seen.
 

RANDY FISHER

Second Unit
Joined
Sep 1, 1998
Messages
285
I agree with Greg. Looks incredible on my 36" XBR and RP-82. I would be willing to say in the top 2 or 3 disks I own.

Randy
 

Adam Tyner

Screenwriter
Joined
Sep 29, 2000
Messages
1,410
But given the general disdain MST3k: The Movie has been given (by non-fans) I was absolutely floored by how good it looked. Closest thing to hi-def I've ever seen on my HDTV.
...and it's not even 16x9-enhanced, if I remember correctly. (Don't have the disc myself.)
 

LukeB

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2000
Messages
2,178
Yeah, Star Wars I and Star Wars II are the worst movies ever and the worst video and audio quality ever! :rolleyes
 

Mark Zimmer

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
4,318
Then you should check out The Quiet Man for a ghastly studio release.

The hands-down worst transfer ever is Magical Mystery Tour, which looks utterly miserable and other than the songs (which seem to be inserted from the album) the dialogue is completely unintelligible.
 

JimmyK

Second Unit
Joined
Jun 21, 2002
Messages
479
Real Name
Jim
It seems some are confusing a bad looking film with a bad looking transfer/DVD.

If the DVD version accuratly represents the film, then the transfer could be said to be excellent, even if the film itself looks bad.

Does AOTC look a bit soft? Yes. But I suspect this is the way the original film looks and not the result of a "poor transfer".

As far as ATOC being the worst looking DVD, whether because of the original film or the transfer process, I do not agree. I've seen other DVDs where the original film looked bad AND the transfer was bad. ATOC may not be the absolute best, but it's far from being the worst.

Just my humble opinion.:)

JimmyK
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,278
Messages
5,134,512
Members
144,340
Latest member
Phoneman66
Recent bookmarks
0
Top