If the SVS drivers were 15" instead of 12...

Discussion in 'Speakers & Subwoofers' started by MikaelG, May 11, 2003.

  1. MikaelG

    MikaelG Agent

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How much more SPL capability would they perform in
     
  2. Reginald Trent

    Reginald Trent Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2000
    Messages:
    1,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think 12" drivers are the prefect compromise for subs. While enabling it to reproduce low end it also can response quicker to fast bass notes than a 15". I've heard some 15" drivers make a series of fast bass notes sound like one continuous note.

    Botton line, I think SVS shoots for a balanced sounding setup over simply SPL.

    BTW I own a 16-46 PCI [​IMG]
     
  3. Vince Maskeeper

    Vince Maskeeper Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 1999
    Messages:
    6,499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not sure how this ended up in software- but this question belongs in Speakers/Subs
     
  4. Reginald Trent

    Reginald Trent Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2000
    Messages:
    1,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I agree.
     
  5. Michael R Price

    Michael R Price Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2001
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If anything the 15" drivers would have less output at lower frequencies, because they'd need a larger enclosure to get the same performance. If you dropped a typical 15" driver in one of the SVS cylinders, it would be way overdamped. Then there's also the issue of needing more amplifier power to take advantage of the extra displacement, in that size cylinder.

    There are good reasons SVS has stayed with 12" drivers..Tom could elaborate. What I just said might be one of them.
     
  6. Dustin B

    Dustin B Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2001
    Messages:
    3,126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I really wish this 15" and 18" drivers aren't as fast as 12" drivers in bass frequencies myth would die.

    http://www.adireaudio.com/tech_papers/woofer_speed.htm

    There are 15" drivers that can do midrange duty as well or better than any 5.25" driver out there (and their efficiency leaves 5.25" drivers in the dust). It is however more difficult to make a 15" cone that doens't have break up modes in the midrange than it is a 5.25" driver, but it can and is done.

    Driver size also has no effect on how low a frequency the driver can play. A 1" tweeter could play 20hz, just can't move enough air to make it audible.

    How much air a driver can move is more or less directly correlated to how loud the driver can play a certain frequency though. And a 15" driver with the same travel ability of a 12" driver will be able to displace ~60% more air. Or put another way it has to move 60% less than the 12" driver to achieve the same output level. And in general the farther the driver travels the less linear its response becomes.

    The main reason you don't see 15" drivers in SVS products is enclosure size. 15" drivers in general require larger enclosures to work properly, and the added displacement ability will also require a larger enclosure to fit sufficient porting. People complain about the size of SVSubs now and 15" driver versions would be even bigger. Adds to material and shipping costs and reduces even further the number of people interested in the product.
     
  7. Geoff L

    Geoff L Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    1,693
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well put Dustin...[​IMG]

    Nice quick "basic" education, put in a easy to understand way for the masses that may not understand woofage & design.

    Cheers
    Geoff

    Edit:
    15's SLOW, driver and cabinet designed Wrong=True! Designed correctly, every bit as (fast, quick, you pick the word) as Any Size Bass Drive, PERIOD...
     
  8. steve nn

    steve nn Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2002
    Messages:
    2,418
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks for putting that straight Dustin. I was getting a little queasy and then you came along. Well said! :wink:
     
  9. Tom Vodhanel

    Tom Vodhanel Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 1998
    Messages:
    2,215
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dustin and I only agree on about 95% of stuff, and thankfully ( surely avoiding a lengthy debate) this falls under that 95% for the most part..[​IMG]

    I have a room full of different 15s, been working with them for...man, must be going on two years now. All kinds of cool designs from Thilo (TC) and Scott (Destilj) and a few other companies looking for some feedback(or business). So it isn't that we haven't spent a good deal of time on that path...we just haven't found the right design combinations yet.

    Tom V.
    SVS
     
  10. RISUG

    RISUG Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2003
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I third that Dustin,bravo. Being the proud owner of a pair
    AR1's (each tower containing a 15" 500 watt sub) I defini-
    -tely know that the "bigger means slower/sloppier" is noth-
    -ing but an old wives tale. [​IMG]
     
  11. Mark Fitzsimmons

    Mark Fitzsimmons Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Tube based subwoofers with 15" drivers always end up far too big for my tastes. However, a 15" driver could probably work out quite nicely in the PB2-Plus enclosure.

    I imagine it would perform similarly to the twin 12" version, however be more affordable due to the cost of one driver vs. two.
     
  12. Scott Simonian

    Scott Simonian Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2001
    Messages:
    1,281
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was a simple compromise Im sure. The cylinders would have to be big and W I D E. This isnt very practical for most folks. NOt me. I myself have a vented Tempest and it is the fastest sub I have ever heard. It is big and boxy but I dont care about that.

    rant/
    Ugh. I hate it when people think anything bigger than 10" or 12" is going to have slow, sloppy bass. Where does all this bullshit come from? If it had any truth in it, it would just have something to do with moving mass. I think a bigger driver with less moving mass with a nice low Fs will play lower and "faster" than a heavier 12.
    /rant
     
  13. Brett DiMichele

    Brett DiMichele Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,181
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Speed is all a factor of BL as the Adire article stated.

    BUT... Weight does play a factor in it.. It's kind of hard
    to say well this 15 has to be slower than this 12.. Etc..

    You can't generalize without knowing the T/S Parameters.
    There are some 15's out there tha will outgun a 10" without
    breaking a sweat (as far as transient response is concerned).
     
  14. Adam Bluhm

    Adam Bluhm Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Messages:
    611
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0


    What about the B4?

    I remember one of the fellas at SVS say something to the tune of, "We'll start using 15" drivers when they prove to be more beneficial than the 12"." [paraphrased!]

    Most SVS subs are flat through 20hz, so why the bigger driver? More spl maybe?
     
  15. Scott Simonian

    Scott Simonian Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2001
    Messages:
    1,281
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    More surface area, more displacement, more extension. That is not always the case.
     
  16. Dustin B

    Dustin B Producer

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2001
    Messages:
    3,126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What Jack said is what I think is why the PB2 is still using 12" drivers.

    This will probably fall in the 5% Tom mentioned above, but I think the reason the B4 isn't a B2 with two 15" drivers is the costs associated with getting a new 15" driver tooled up into their production deals. The dB12 was already being made and relatively inexpensive.
     
  17. Tom Vodhanel

    Tom Vodhanel Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 1998
    Messages:
    2,215
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    0
    >>>This will probably fall in the 5% Tom mentioned above, but I think the reason the B4 isn't a B2 with two 15" drivers is the costs associated with getting a new 15" driver tooled up into their production deals. The dB12 was already being made and relatively inexpensive.
     
  18. MikaelG

    MikaelG Agent

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hmm ok.

    I really don't understand the pessimism when it comes to 15 inch or more? What is all this BS about 15 inches won't work, because bla bla bla... ever heard of HGS-15 or B&W ASW4000? Do they shake? Are those bad subwoofers? Don't think so...

    If Velodyne can do a 18 inch monster, that can be blown away by two 12 inch SVSs, then isn't it interesting what a 18 inch SVS could do? I mean it's not like it's impossible.

    I'm not interested WHY SVS doesn't have 15 inch drivers in their subs, it's pretty obvious, they want to sell subs too, not be pioneers in having loudest SPL in lowest Hz. In order to do that, they must compromize.

    Now I wonder, if a 15 or 18 inch SVS driver would be placed in a equally larger enclosure, raising all parameters with equal amount of percentage, how much louder would it be?

    If 12x + 5y = 100z

    then I wan't to know how many z:s

    18x + 7,5y equals to.

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page