Todd smith
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2002
- Messages
- 643
Will this set look good with digital cable?
Home Theater
Entertainment & Streaming Content
Physical Media
Home Theater Equipment and Hardware
Other Diversions
Bargains and Classifieds
Home Theater Forum
-
Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
How will a Sony xbr450 look with digital cable? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Todd smith
- Start date
Arthur S
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 1999
- Messages
- 2,571
Todd
I had "digital cable" for 7 months.
To my eyes, digital cable was no better or worse than regular cable. As was always the case, the premium channels looked great. The other channels were all over the place in terms of picture quality.
Since you are asking specifically about Sony XBR 450 the other part of the equation is Digital Reality Creation. The newest generation of XBR due out any time now, will have adjustable DRC. I believe this would be a worthwhile feature for any cable viewer.
The only other thing I can think of is that Consumer Reports recently tested big screens and they found that the Hitachi 53UXD10B had very good picture quality with standard definition material (cable, satellite). This set lists for $2,500 and can easily be had for $2,250 or less at Sears. Totally different beast, but if you have room for a 53, I'd go for it.
Artie
I had "digital cable" for 7 months.
To my eyes, digital cable was no better or worse than regular cable. As was always the case, the premium channels looked great. The other channels were all over the place in terms of picture quality.
Since you are asking specifically about Sony XBR 450 the other part of the equation is Digital Reality Creation. The newest generation of XBR due out any time now, will have adjustable DRC. I believe this would be a worthwhile feature for any cable viewer.
The only other thing I can think of is that Consumer Reports recently tested big screens and they found that the Hitachi 53UXD10B had very good picture quality with standard definition material (cable, satellite). This set lists for $2,500 and can easily be had for $2,250 or less at Sears. Totally different beast, but if you have room for a 53, I'd go for it.
Artie
Todd smith
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2002
- Messages
- 643
Thanks for the info Arthur. I really need a direct view, 4:3 tv as I will be doing a good amount of gaming on this set and dont want to risk the burn in on a big screen. Any idea when the new xbr set will make an apearance? Do you think the geometry will be improved with the new flat screens including the new xbr? Maybe hard to predict, but what do you think?
Todd smith
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2002
- Messages
- 643
One more question. I will be using my xbox as my dvd player with my tv which will have a 16/9 squeeze mode. My xbox does not do 480p just 480i.
My question is will the 16/9 squeeze mode on my tv squeeze the 480i interlaced picture for dvd?
I guess an easier way to say it is will the 16/9 squeeze mode work on a 480p source and a 480i source?
My question is will the 16/9 squeeze mode on my tv squeeze the 480i interlaced picture for dvd?
I guess an easier way to say it is will the 16/9 squeeze mode work on a 480p source and a 480i source?
MikeyWeitz
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2002
- Messages
- 939
Altho I have a Samsung 32 HDTV direct view, 16:9 should work regardless of scan rate.
Steve Owen
Second Unit
- Joined
- Jan 7, 1999
- Messages
- 416
If digital cable is anything like digital satellite (and I think they're probably pretty close), then my experience is that it'll look pretty darn good once the set is reasonably calibrated. My folks have this set and DirecTV and I'm very impressed with the results (so much so that I'm seriously looking into getting one of these sets myself).
-Steve
-Steve
Similar threads
