I would subscribe to a M. Reuben DVD / blu-Ray newsletter.
It's still not gone. I await my PDF of the March 2016 issue. When it arrives, I will print a copy of the new issue, enjoy reading it, and put it on top of the pile. My collection goes back to 1990, and I have two versions of his laserdisc book and two versions of his DVD book. His writing is stylish and fun to read, and his insights are reliably interesting and usually unique. I've received so much pleasure over the years from Douglas Pratt's video reviews. If he only wrote film reviews he'd probably be considered one of the great American movie reviewers.
It's been 12 pages for several years, but I'll take what I can get. He doesn't just cover the newest releases; he goes deep with box sets, featured directors, and T.V. series. He now covers 3-D Blu-Rays as well. And he consistently reviews DVD's from Warner Archive and Fox Cinema Archives. In fact, he'll compare DVD's of new releases to their Blu-Rays, which almost no other reviewer does, and which points to his stubborn obsession about content over format.How big is each issue nowadays? In its heyday, it had 80-90 reviews per issue. In 2011, when I last subscribed it, it was down to 30-40 reviews and only about 6-10 Blu-rays. The Dec 2010 only had 16 reviews with 3 Blu-rays; maybe he was on vacation then.
It's been 12 pages for several years, but I'll take what I can get. He doesn't just cover the newest releases; he goes deep with box sets, featured directors, and T.V. series. He now covers 3-D Blu-Rays as well. And he consistently reviews DVD's from Warner Archive and Fox. In fact, he'll compare DVD's of new releases to their Blu-Rays, which almost no other reviewer does, and which points to his stubborn obsession about content over format.
My biggest qualm with Pratt is his use of the pronoun "we," when clearly it is he himself writing these reviews. It just seems pretentious and has always bugged me. His detailed descriptions of laser discs were otherwise pretty awesome, if not always grammatically correct, so I probably shouldn't get too caught up in things like that. His $25.00 book of laser disc reviews, which I still have, is a reference guide I still refer to on occasion. But, were he to write movie reviews, I would suggest he use the more accurate pronoun, "I."It's still not gone. I await my PDF of the March 2016 issue. When it arrives, I will print a copy of the new issue, enjoy reading it, and put it on top of the pile. My collection goes back to 1990, and I have two versions of his laserdisc book and two versions of his DVD book. His writing is stylish and fun to read, and his insights are reliably interesting and usually unique. I've received so much pleasure over the years from Douglas Pratt's video reviews. If he only wrote film reviews he'd probably be considered one of the great American movie reviewers.
My biggest qualm with Pratt is his use of the pronoun "we," when clearly it is he himself writing these reviews. It just seems pretentious and has always bugged me. His detailed descriptions of laser discs were otherwise pretty awesome, if not always grammatically correct, so I probably shouldn't get too caught up in things like that. His $25.00 book of laser disc reviews, which I still have, is a reference guide I still refer to on occasion. But, were he to write movie reviews, I would suggest he use the more accurate pronoun, "I."
Is there a website for this now or how do we get to his newsletter these days?
I live in the UK where laserdiscs never really took off, so have never owned any. This is an interesting thread all the same though. I assume that Doug is, as the French say, "d'une certaine age" and either doesn't see the importance of the internet in easily disseminating information to the masses or at this point in his life isn't willing to learn everything necessary to do so. It's a shame but entirely understandable.
I know of several people who are the world's acknowledged experts in their particular specialist area of film, but resolutely stick to writing only with pen and paper or publishing extremely niche books that relatively few people will ever read. Nonetheless their work is fascinating, unique, groundbreaking stuff that could find a much wider audience and inspire others to advance it further, if only they could access it or even knew it existed.
Of course I'm not implying it's purely an age-related perspective: I also know of countless folk in their 70s, 80s and even beyond, who have been avidly blazing an internet trail for years and continue to do so.