Lord Dalek
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2005
- Messages
- 7,090
- Real Name
- Joel Henderson
Its a scope reduction print.
May we get this straight, please? Scanned from 35mm but shot in actual 70mm? Yes? No? Well, yes, but the 70mm reels apparently are so damaged as to be unusable. But the 35mm element was, according to what I've read, 4.3. So, what exactly is this restoration from? Did the 70mm reels suddenly become usable? Was there a 35mm scope negative created from the original 70mm?
You know I think Gary already has a place in hell for all his "pulled out of his ass" technojargon Tooze-ism bullcrap, but this new Zavitz guy is now really starting to tick me off by straining to find a teal bias where there isn't one.
Well he explicitly writes that isn't the case so you seem to strain to find a fault with what he writes especially when the conclusion of the review is very positive
Война и мир, trans.
It may be "positive" but he ALWAYS mentions a "teal" push or bias when there isn't one. It's completely irritating. And of course the techno-jargon referred to is malapropism at its finest.
Thanks for the info.
Am a few hours south of Sydney.
Tried Amazon US just over a week ago but when checking out, the site said it could not ship to Australia.
Also tried their UK site with the same result.
You must have been lucky !!!!
If you have a magic formula, please let me know
You know I think Gary already has a place in hell for all his "pulled out of his ass" technojargon Tooze-ism bullcrap
Depends on if the reduction was made from a 65mm element that had its magnetic strips already applied or not.Is the Blu-ray going to be vertically cropped compared to 70mm prints?
Russian cameras used 70 not 65 mm stock.
Technical documentation that supports that claim please.