Chris
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 1997
- Messages
- 6,788
Keith-
So, are you saying MJ is a latent Jim Jones? I've had that thought recently
So, are you saying MJ is a latent Jim Jones? I've had that thought recently
His decision to allow children on his ranch is one thing, but to not have a supervisor there to protect himself is a bad move on his part.It just may be a good move if you are Michael. Having a supervisor around to see what goes on is probably the last thing he wants. IMHO, this man is not stupid, he is a predator. His zoo, ferris wheel and "slumber parties" are no different from the creepy, unmarried guy down the street that has a pool, lots of video games and likes to invite the neighborhood kids out for "ice cream". My parents would not let me go to that guy's house and parents should feel the same about Michael. Even if he is "innocent", he is strange and obsessed with children, which should be enough for all to steer clear. But I understand where some people like to give the benefit of the doubt. My sister-in-law had a neighbor that used to come in her yard and spend hours "talking and playing" with her kids. She thought he was "harmless". I happened to be there when my sister's kids were playing and I heard the guy asking them to call him "Uncle Bob". Needless to say, "Uncle Bob" got a talking to by "Uncle Jeff" and had to find some other playmates from that day on. It may have been innocent, but it was creepy and unwanted . . . case closed.
The fact that the complainants did settle for money tells me that nothing did happen.Sadly, I wouldn't find it the least bit surprising that parents would take the money and shut-up knowing that their child had been sexually molested. Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if a parent whored out their kid to the gloved one for a pre-determined price.
What's the deal with Garagos (sp?). Is he a complete media whore or what?
The fact that the complainants did settle for money tells me that nothing did happen. If your kid had been sexually abused would you really settle for money? Any parent with respect and care for their kid would say no way.Hmmm, the estimated $15-40m settlement in the first incident does buy a lot of therapy....
The Smoking Gun posted this. It's the official court declaration filed by the kid in the first incident. It's pretty graphic so proceed with caution.
The fact that the complainants did settle for money tells me that nothing did happen.I think the first lawsuit back in 1993 was a civil lawsuit, so all they could ever get from him anyway was money.
Matt
... At the end of the day, this is nothing but a modern-day lynching.What was the over/under on someone playing the race card?