Serge Breton
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2001
- Messages
- 528
Ok,
It is said(by many) that in recent years for home theater purposes that receivers (including cheap ones) are becoming more and more capable of competing with seperate processors(the big boys). I'm conducting these tests just to see if this is just hype or to see if there is some truth to it. Who knows, maybe nowadays seperates aren't really that much better stricktly for home theater!
My 2 channel set-up is all set-up, now i'm just in the process of figuring out my home theater part of my system. In the past i have owned a Parasound AVC 1800 processor, an Acurus Act-3 prepro and an Outlaw 950. I have considered the Rotel 1066, Anthem AVM 20 and Lexicon DC-1 processors but am trying to spend less rather than more while at the same time not compromising anything for home theater sound quality. My new philosophy is to upgrade every year or two as new formats arise rather than put all my eggs in one basket in purchasing an expensive preamp processor. It may seem that i'm asking for the impossible here but read on....
The only receivers available at Future Shop were the Panasonic HE100 among others, the Kenwood 6070 receiver and a HK 320 and 520. I chose the Kenwood 6070 for this test and it cost $774CAN which equals approx $500 retail (yes i know i overpayed for this receiver). I have 30 days to conduct my experiment before returning the unit which will give me ample time to decide if a receiver is suitable or better yet worthy to belong in my home theater rack
A few positives on the Kenwood:
THX surround EX post processing
DD/DTS, DD EX, DTS Matrix, ES
DTS Neo 6
DPL II
8ch preouts
large speaker setting or standard 80HZ crossover which i find acceptable for HT purposes but i would prefer an adjustable crossover below 80HZ. Still better than the 100hz crossover points found in the cheaper receivers such as the HE100.
looks are acceptable
negatives:
big and bulky,
remote
artificial DSP modes, silly active and speaker eq's that aren't used anyways
no RS-232 control:frowning:
had to use the units manual for set-up, this is a first for me since usually i am able to figure everything out without the help of the manual.
receiver clicks when switching inputs
On to the review:
The Kenwood is being used as a prepro, running the preouts to my ATI 1502 amp for the front channels and a B&K AV 5000 for the remaining 5 channels.
Popped in several DVD's and the Kenwood had no problem figuring out which surround format was on the DVD. The nice thing when compared to my Outlaw or Act-3 prepro is the lack of loud pops when switching surround modes. An audible click would occur from the receiver but this is much better than the loud static noise heard from my speakers when using my other prepros (potentially harmful to my speakers).
How did the unit sound you ask? Pretty good considering and more than acceptable. The sound was nice and clear, fairly neutral and well controlled. Let's just say i wasen't reaching for the remote due to my ears bleeding attesting to horrible sound. These are only some initial tests but i ALMOST could live with this receiver as a prepro and more tests will be conducted over the next couple of weeks. I'm not saying this receiver is a winner but i expect from my tests so far that in finding the right receiver that i can have good surround sound for movies all the while spending 1/4-1/3rd the price to that of a dedicated prepro. Sure the prepro will beat the pants off a receiver for music (that's a given)but this is not part of my tests here. All i want from the said receiver is all it's surround formats and the preamp section. The amps, 6 ch input and everything else are simply not used; so if Kenwood or the said manufacturer decided to skimp on the amplification which is where most manufacturers cut costs nowadays, i don't care because i'm not using it anyways. More to come....
It is said(by many) that in recent years for home theater purposes that receivers (including cheap ones) are becoming more and more capable of competing with seperate processors(the big boys). I'm conducting these tests just to see if this is just hype or to see if there is some truth to it. Who knows, maybe nowadays seperates aren't really that much better stricktly for home theater!
My 2 channel set-up is all set-up, now i'm just in the process of figuring out my home theater part of my system. In the past i have owned a Parasound AVC 1800 processor, an Acurus Act-3 prepro and an Outlaw 950. I have considered the Rotel 1066, Anthem AVM 20 and Lexicon DC-1 processors but am trying to spend less rather than more while at the same time not compromising anything for home theater sound quality. My new philosophy is to upgrade every year or two as new formats arise rather than put all my eggs in one basket in purchasing an expensive preamp processor. It may seem that i'm asking for the impossible here but read on....
The only receivers available at Future Shop were the Panasonic HE100 among others, the Kenwood 6070 receiver and a HK 320 and 520. I chose the Kenwood 6070 for this test and it cost $774CAN which equals approx $500 retail (yes i know i overpayed for this receiver). I have 30 days to conduct my experiment before returning the unit which will give me ample time to decide if a receiver is suitable or better yet worthy to belong in my home theater rack
A few positives on the Kenwood:
THX surround EX post processing
DD/DTS, DD EX, DTS Matrix, ES
DTS Neo 6
DPL II
8ch preouts
large speaker setting or standard 80HZ crossover which i find acceptable for HT purposes but i would prefer an adjustable crossover below 80HZ. Still better than the 100hz crossover points found in the cheaper receivers such as the HE100.
looks are acceptable
negatives:
big and bulky,
remote
artificial DSP modes, silly active and speaker eq's that aren't used anyways
no RS-232 control:frowning:
had to use the units manual for set-up, this is a first for me since usually i am able to figure everything out without the help of the manual.
receiver clicks when switching inputs
On to the review:
The Kenwood is being used as a prepro, running the preouts to my ATI 1502 amp for the front channels and a B&K AV 5000 for the remaining 5 channels.
Popped in several DVD's and the Kenwood had no problem figuring out which surround format was on the DVD. The nice thing when compared to my Outlaw or Act-3 prepro is the lack of loud pops when switching surround modes. An audible click would occur from the receiver but this is much better than the loud static noise heard from my speakers when using my other prepros (potentially harmful to my speakers).
How did the unit sound you ask? Pretty good considering and more than acceptable. The sound was nice and clear, fairly neutral and well controlled. Let's just say i wasen't reaching for the remote due to my ears bleeding attesting to horrible sound. These are only some initial tests but i ALMOST could live with this receiver as a prepro and more tests will be conducted over the next couple of weeks. I'm not saying this receiver is a winner but i expect from my tests so far that in finding the right receiver that i can have good surround sound for movies all the while spending 1/4-1/3rd the price to that of a dedicated prepro. Sure the prepro will beat the pants off a receiver for music (that's a given)but this is not part of my tests here. All i want from the said receiver is all it's surround formats and the preamp section. The amps, 6 ch input and everything else are simply not used; so if Kenwood or the said manufacturer decided to skimp on the amplification which is where most manufacturers cut costs nowadays, i don't care because i'm not using it anyways. More to come....