What's new

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,424
Real Name
Robert Harris
As films go, the 1979 Australian production, Mad Max probably wouldn’t
get much more than a blip on the radar had it not introduced Mel Gibson
to American audiences.
It’s an extremely low budget affair, neither well directed (by George Miller),
nor photographed. It simply exists.
But it’s essential viewing for fans of the genre and the character.
Both the original Australian track as well as the American dub are included. The dub
is far from perfect, but for those who can’t understand the accent of the subcontinent,
it’s all we have. I prefer the original.
Imagery is beautifully reproduced in 4k, with sharp, rich colors, great stability, and
proper grain. It’s all there, and Kino’s presentation couldn’t be better.
Image – 5 (Dolby Vision)
Audio – 5
Pass / Fail – Pass
Upgrade from Blu-ray – Yes
Recommended
RAH

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jeffrey D

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2018
Messages
5,221
Real Name
Jeffrey D Hanawalt
As far as the cinematography goes, the most memorable shot in my opinion is right before Goose crashes his bike (the over the shoulder shot with the scenery whizzing by).
 

jayembee

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
6,774
Location
Hamster Shire
Real Name
Jerry
I've always felt that the American dub wasn't done so much because of un-understandable (to Americans) accents, but because of incomprehensible (to Americans) Aussie colloquialisms.

I don't find this film to be poorly directed. For the first directorial effort by an ER doctor, it manages to have pretty well-done action sequences. Some of the acting may be a bit dodgy, but otherwise, I think it's a reasonably good "drive-in fare" (which is literally was in its first American release).

But yes, Mad Max 2 was a significant step up on every level.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,424
Real Name
Robert Harris
I've always felt that the American dub wasn't done so much because of un-understandable (to Americans) accents, but because of incomprehensible (to Americans) Aussie colloquialisms.

I don't find this film to be poorly directed. For the first directorial effort by an ER doctor, it manages to have pretty well-done action sequences. Some of the acting may be a bit dodgy, but otherwise, I think it's a reasonably good "drive-in fare" (which is literally was in its first American release).

But yes, Mad Max 2 was a significant step up on every level.
Reasonably good drive-in fare, it is. AIP.
 

Mark-P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2005
Messages
6,506
Location
Camas, WA
Real Name
Mark Probst
As much as I liked the film when it was first released, it seems terribly dated now unlike Mad Max 2 (Road Warrier) which was vastly better and remains a first-rate action film with mythic elements.
Regarding the first film, I’m in the opposite camp. I first watched it in the 1980s and hated every second of it. The younger version of me had no tolerance for it. Flash forward 35 years to the release of Fury Road, I decided to give the original film another try. This time I liked it very much. The years had refined my tastes.
 

WinstonCely

Second Unit
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
273
Real Name
Winston Cely
"It’s an extremely low budget affair, neither well directed (by George Miller)... It simply exists."

I couldn't disagree more. I use the opening of this up to The Nightrider's death as an example of how to quickly and efficiently introduce characters without the need for massive amounts of exposition. The rest of the film simply never stops, admittedly the slowest part being Max's family road trip.

As for Mel's performance, it OK, but still very green. Frankly, Hughe Keys Bryne was much more compelling with his rapidly changing accents that seemed to make him more threatening. Almost on the level of Jack Nicholson in terms of perfectly pitched over-acting.

Absolutely dated, especially when feed as a film until itself, but as a fan of the series, I like to look at it as more of a time capsule of its universe. Max's world went post-apocalyptic back in our 1980's.
 

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
7,107
Real Name
Joel Henderson
FTR Mad Max 1 and 2 are technically not post-apocalyptic films as the nuclear war occured in between Road Warrior and Beyond Thunderdome.
 

Jeff Cooper

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2000
Messages
3,016
Location
Little Elm, TX
Real Name
Jeff Cooper
FTR Mad Max 1 and 2 are technically not post-apocalyptic films as the nuclear war occured in between Road Warrior and Beyond Thunderdome.
Been a looooong time since I saw it, but doesn't Road Warrior begin with a recap of the war that destroyed everything?
 

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
7,107
Real Name
Joel Henderson
Been a looooong time since I saw it, but doesn't Road Warrior begin with a recap of the war that destroyed everything?
There's a recap but its about a small scale war between Iran and Saudi Arabia that dried up the oil supply.

...and that happened before the events of Mad Max anyway.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,061
Messages
5,129,871
Members
144,281
Latest member
papill6n
Recent bookmarks
0
Top