shoeshineboy
Second Unit
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2009
- Messages
- 432
- Real Name
- dan olson
One show that I was exposed to in reruns in the 70s that I liked was Peter Gunn; I thought it was sleek, cheeky and hip as a teenager. I bought the whole set last year and after a few episodes was amazed at how to me it seemed banal, lacking in suspense and intensity. On the other hand, Mike Hammer w/ Darren McGavin was completely new to me when I bought it 3 years ago; while it had some episodes that lacked in cohesive plots and threadbare, most of the shows had a lot more zing and a like ability - despite the fact I never cottoned to the other Hammer shows or stories... McGavin seemed just more interesting as a lead than Stevens, and he was able to elevate the material that much more. Now, I know I'm in the minority on this exact topic, but...