eddified
Agent
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 37
- Real Name
- Eddie
Hello,
I've got an unfinished basement and am in planning stages right now. I had settled on building a 5.2.2 home theater system (used almost exclusively for tv & movies) with in-wall & in-ceiling speakers (including in-wall Left, Right and Center speakers), but with 2 standalone powered 12" subwoofers.
But then my co-worker showed me what he's putting in his new basement home theater, he's doing a 5.2.2 with in-wall everything, including in-wall subs.
This made me begin to question my decision to get standalone subwoofers.
The plan right now is for the room to be 12' by about 19'. I have a large family [7.5 children, perhaps more in the future] so fitting seating for everyone is a high priority. I say this because I'm slightly concerned about fitting 2 12" subwoofers...
I know that in-wall speakers will compromise the sound when compared with the same money spent on on-wall/floorstanding speakers. -- And I'm ok with that. I also know that in-wall subwoofers will also have compromised sound when compared with the same money spent on a standalone subwoofer. ...
So, I'm asking this: is there a big difference between compromising sound for in-wall speakers, and compromising sound for in-wall subwoofer?
Stated another way, (assuming I'm not an extreme bass enthusiast), is it strange for me to not want to compromise on the sound quality of an in-wall sub, but be ok compromising with the sound quality of in-wall speakers?
Rephrasing the question differently one more time: Is the compromise on sound quality when going to an in-wall sub a much larger compromise on sound quality than the compromise when going to in-wall speakers? Or is it a comparable compromise?
I'm enticed by the idea of getting 2 large standalone subs off the floor, but.... I'm worried about sound quality. Should I be very worried about in-wall subwoofer sound quality?
I've got an unfinished basement and am in planning stages right now. I had settled on building a 5.2.2 home theater system (used almost exclusively for tv & movies) with in-wall & in-ceiling speakers (including in-wall Left, Right and Center speakers), but with 2 standalone powered 12" subwoofers.
But then my co-worker showed me what he's putting in his new basement home theater, he's doing a 5.2.2 with in-wall everything, including in-wall subs.
This made me begin to question my decision to get standalone subwoofers.
The plan right now is for the room to be 12' by about 19'. I have a large family [7.5 children, perhaps more in the future] so fitting seating for everyone is a high priority. I say this because I'm slightly concerned about fitting 2 12" subwoofers...
I know that in-wall speakers will compromise the sound when compared with the same money spent on on-wall/floorstanding speakers. -- And I'm ok with that. I also know that in-wall subwoofers will also have compromised sound when compared with the same money spent on a standalone subwoofer. ...
So, I'm asking this: is there a big difference between compromising sound for in-wall speakers, and compromising sound for in-wall subwoofer?
Stated another way, (assuming I'm not an extreme bass enthusiast), is it strange for me to not want to compromise on the sound quality of an in-wall sub, but be ok compromising with the sound quality of in-wall speakers?
Rephrasing the question differently one more time: Is the compromise on sound quality when going to an in-wall sub a much larger compromise on sound quality than the compromise when going to in-wall speakers? Or is it a comparable compromise?
I'm enticed by the idea of getting 2 large standalone subs off the floor, but.... I'm worried about sound quality. Should I be very worried about in-wall subwoofer sound quality?