benbess
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,670
- Real Name
- Ben
A comment on how death is handled in The Bridges at Toko-Ri. Spoiler alert....
I was struck in watching Bridges at Toko-Ri at how differently death tends to be handled in some of today's movies. At the end of the film, William Holden, Mickey Rooney, and Earl Holliman are shot down behind enemy lines. One by one they are killed, and although they try to fight back and shoot back, it seemed to me comparatively realistic how they were surrounded and outgunned and were killed. They didn't, as with some Tom Cruise or other stars today, amazingly take out dozens and then somehow survive to the end as heroes to the swelling of the soundtrack. Instead they died painfully as humans rather than as superheroes, with William Holden upset but accepting in the end what his superior officer Frederic March said about this war. Having Grace Kelly in the cast, with her luminous presence, as well as their children, shows how much he is giving up.
Several poignant scenes in this seemed somewhat understated, although the movie's screenplay was clearly telegraphing where the film was going almost from the start.
I enjoy John Wayne's performances in many films, and he brings such a presence and range. And so it's not meant as anything against him that William Holden is imho better than JW for this particular role. It's almost like it was a precursor to The Bridge on the River Kwai. In some ways, the roles are similar. Holden is a reluctant hero, but all the more realistic for that.
I'm surprised that this one isn't on blu-ray. And also slightly surprised that fans of the film haven't comment out of the woodwork to comment on it so far. But perhaps that will come. I rate it very highly for this year, and, finally, I'm also surprised that according to wikipedia it didn't make the box office top 10 for this year. But perhaps the rather somber ending that I like so much about it is the reason why it wasn't a big box office hit.
Several poignant scenes in this seemed somewhat understated, although the movie's screenplay was clearly telegraphing where the film was going almost from the start.
I enjoy John Wayne's performances in many films, and he brings such a presence and range. And so it's not meant as anything against him that William Holden is imho better than JW for this particular role. It's almost like it was a precursor to The Bridge on the River Kwai. In some ways, the roles are similar. Holden is a reluctant hero, but all the more realistic for that.
I'm surprised that this one isn't on blu-ray. And also slightly surprised that fans of the film haven't comment out of the woodwork to comment on it so far. But perhaps that will come. I rate it very highly for this year, and, finally, I'm also surprised that according to wikipedia it didn't make the box office top 10 for this year. But perhaps the rather somber ending that I like so much about it is the reason why it wasn't a big box office hit.