1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

International Warners Rubbish

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Chris55, Nov 18, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Message #1 of 33 Nov 18, 2019
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2019
    Chris55

    Chris55 Auditioning

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2019
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Real Name:
    chris
    I've had so much disappointment over the years with Warners discs that I wouldn't really know where to begin. A lot of the expensive sets I've bought of Stars and musicals and TV series, all from Warners, have been faulty, either when first bought them or when I went to play them again, even though I look after my DVD collection very carefully. The latest mishap is the same two movies on two different discs on a Warners set, even though marked differently on each disc. And, of course, to top it off, the disgusting copy (virtually looking like an old tape recording) of the classic movie "Giant" on Bluray. Being a Bluray, I automatically thought it would be remastered at least, but the copy was awful, to say the least. Warners are really going to have to pull their socks up or will soon be out of business as I,for one , will not be buying anymore of their DVDs...
     
  2. atcolomb

    atcolomb Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,549
    Likes Received:
    1,330
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    Chicago Area
    Real Name:
    Angelo
    With Giant I believe Warner Bros did the best they could on releasing the Blu-ray. The original negative not in great condition adds to some of the issues but overall the Blu-ray looks fine to me.
     
    Jimbo64 likes this.
  3. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    16,806
    Likes Received:
    20,009
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    The Blu-ray for Giant accurately represents the look of the film. It’s just not, and never was, a great looking film due to choices made by the original production team on film stocks and post production team on editing and compositing choices. It’s not that the Blu is bad; it’s that the extra resolution of the format reveals the flaws in the original work.
     
    Jack K, Gary16, Tino and 2 others like this.
  4. Chris55

    Chris55 Auditioning

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2019
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Real Name:
    chris
    Well, Warners released "Swing Time" (1936) recently on a Blu Ray, remastered, even though they didn't have the original negative, which is lost apparently, and for a b/w movie made nearly twenty years before "Giant", it looked fantastic and like a new movie, albeit b/w, so it is ridiculous to suppose that they couldn't have done the same thing with "Giant" , when releasing it on Blu Ray. The fact is that if they go to a lot of trouble to correct a bad print or negative, even if it looked like that originally, they can work wonders digitally as I've seen many times with vintage movies these days.
     
  5. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    44,411
    Likes Received:
    20,047
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    Are we talking about DVDs or Blu-rays in this thread?
     
    Jack K, Tino and Jimbo64 like this.
  6. Chris55

    Chris55 Auditioning

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2019
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Real Name:
    chris
    At the moment Blu Rays
     
  7. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    44,411
    Likes Received:
    20,047
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    What are some of the other Warner titles you're unhappy with then?
     
  8. Chris55

    Chris55 Auditioning

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2019
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Real Name:
    chris
    Well , as regards DVDs, "Classic Musicals From the Dream Factory" Vol.2 are nearly all faulty discs and far too many others to list here. The Blu Ray I was complaining about, wasn't faulty, just a poor picture quality for a Blu Ray release.
     
  9. FrankXS

    FrankXS Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    110
    I love the Warner Archives and their production team. I enjoy the product they put out and the variety of genre. WARNER ARCHIVES ROCKS!!!
     
    Jack K, Tino, Jimbo64 and 2 others like this.
  10. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,474
    Likes Received:
    5,146
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    It might behoove you, and this is just an idea, to actually learn about film, film stocks, opticals, and what Warners was doing back then on certain films. They worked from the original Giant negative. The film is almost one long optical from start to finish, and sadly the opticals were terrible then and terrible now - there is zero that can be done about it. When there are the few shots that are not opticals, they look great - sharp and beautiful. Unfortunately, George Stevens at that point loved long dissolves and since none of the opticals were cut in short, they literally go from scene to scene with almost no non-optical footage. You disparaging Warners for doing yeoman work with a very problematic element is neither helpful nor warranted.
     
    Jack K, Gary16, Tino and 8 others like this.
  11. titch

    titch Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    Messages:
    599
    Likes Received:
    631
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Real Name:
    Kevin Oppegaard
    Before everyone rushes to the defence of Warner Bros, it's easy to forget that Warner were originally one of the worst when it came to paltry encoding on their blu-rays, a hang-over that lasted for years after they abandoned HD-DVD. They used BD-25s for ages and were still encoding many of their titles with a very low bitrate up to five years ago - Gravity, anyone? Giant probably wouldn't have benefitted from better encoding anyway, with all the inherent issues baked-in. However, things have changed for the better - I now generally have no quibble with Warner's releases - Warner Archive's are particularly stellar.
     
  12. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,474
    Likes Received:
    5,146
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    Just to state the obvious: BD-25 isn't evil - it's fine if the film isn't three hours and the disc loaded with extras. Low bit rate is something else, but I guarantee you in a taste test most wouldn't identify correctly if able to identify at all.
     
  13. Chris55

    Chris55 Auditioning

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2019
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Real Name:
    chris
    You want to look at the hundreds of bad reviews on Amazon , who wasted good money buying it, before you berate me !
     
  14. Mark-P

    Mark-P Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    4,785
    Likes Received:
    2,811
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Real Name:
    Mark Probst
    And do you want to look at THIS THREAD, before deciding that you know more than the professionals who post here?
     
    hndrsnsbks, Jack K, Gary16 and 2 others like this.
  15. haineshisway

    haineshisway Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,474
    Likes Received:
    5,146
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Bruce
    No, I don't want to look at hundreds of amateur reviews by people who don't understand film. I'm not berating you - I'm telling you it would be helpful to you if you learned a bit about film and why things are the way they are with certain titles. Berating is something wholly other, my friend.
     
    Jack K, Tino and Jimbo64 like this.
  16. jcroy

    jcroy Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    4,636
    Likes Received:
    1,769
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    jr
    (On a huge tangent without going into politics).

    As much as I agree with you on this issue, in general people are entitled to believe whatever they want about any issue regardless of whether it is highly informed detailed facts or outright stupidity / ignorance / fantasy.

    Independent of being highly informed or stupidity / ignorance, people are entitled to waste their own cash on whatever they want. If the OP is angry about Warner creating "substandard" transfers of old classic films, then he/she doesn't have to waste their own cash on such releases.

    (It is also the OP's absolute right to remain uninformed about Warner's film restoration practices).
     
  17. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    44,411
    Likes Received:
    20,047
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    It's also the forum's right to shed light on misinformation being spread on this forum regarding home video products.
     
    Douglas R, hndrsnsbks, Jack K and 8 others like this.
  18. Worth

    Worth Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,206
    Likes Received:
    2,250
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    Nick Dobbs
    If you choose to believe that the Earth is flat, that's your prerogative, but don't assume other people are going to agree with you.

    Ignorance used to be something people were ashamed of. Now, it seems to have become a badge of honour.
     
    hndrsnsbks, Jack K, ahollis and 4 others like this.
  19. Thomas T

    Thomas T Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2001
    Messages:
    4,252
    Likes Received:
    3,734
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Are you suggesting that Warners alter a film's original look if it doesn't coincide with contemporary tastes? I've seen Giant in both major re-releases and in revival houses, on TV, on laser disc and on DVD and it's never looked as good as in its blu ray incarnation. Is it a stellar disc? No but as someone has already pointed out, it was never a stunning visual. You can digitize and scrub and wax a sow's ear for HD but it's never going to be a silk purse. It is what it is.
     
    Jack K likes this.
  20. jcroy

    jcroy Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    4,636
    Likes Received:
    1,769
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Real Name:
    jr
    Definitely.

    It is like a classic metaphor of bringing the horse to the water, but one can't force the horse to drink the water.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page