What's new

Twisters (Twister Sequel) (1 Viewer)

Robert Saccone

Premium
Joined
Jan 3, 2000
Messages
631
Well obviously no Paxton. Helen Hunt? Do we need a sequel? Maybe it will force a 4K US release (of the original).
 
Last edited:

Edwin-S

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Messages
10,007
If one twister was successful then a whole raft of them should really pack them in. All the material out there to make films, but let's make a sequel to a 26 year old film.
 

Malcolm R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2002
Messages
25,233
Real Name
Malcolm
They had multiple twisters in the first film. Not sure how the same thing would make a sequel different.
 

Malcolm R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2002
Messages
25,233
Real Name
Malcolm
Maybe it's a dance musical, not a sequel.


AdolescentDearAmericanavocet-size_restricted.gif
 

Alex...

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2021
Messages
4,344
Location
Out there, past them trees.
Real Name
Alex Czaplicki
Well obviously no Paxton. Helen Hunt? Do we need a sequel? Maybe it will force a 4K US release.
Sources said that the hope is to bring Helen Hunt back, with a drama that focuses in the daughter she had with the character played by the late Bill Paxton. She has caught the storm chasing bug her parents had.”
 

YANG

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 10, 1999
Messages
1,466
Well obviously no Paxton. Helen Hunt? Do we need a sequel?...
Sequel to depict what's going on in real life where the less concrete developed state is exposed to natural destructive force is... probably a must to remind people and it's state government not to underestimate what kind of scenarios could happened when such forces strikes. Of course depending on strength, some parts could often be regarded by audiences that it looked, exaggerating.
Most audiences would see it as entertainment anyway...

So, the sequel may not need to be a continual development of characters, since 2 of 'em had passed away. However, should there be... probably the project team going or should be cooking up a character who should be 18yrs old, a legitimately off-spring of Bill. That could be either "Jo's" junior or the junior of "Melissa Reeves", where the former had got back together with "Bill" after their adventure getting through the Twisters attack, and the latter whom had been "humped" with "Bill"...

Ever since TWISTER, the one and only flick that deals with Stormy side of natural force without human manipulation, goes to INTO THE STORM. Which in contrast to TWISTER, a little less popular... without the "stellar" casts...
 

Jeff Cooper

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2000
Messages
3,016
Location
Little Elm, TX
Real Name
Jeff Cooper
Sequel to depict what's going on in real life where the less concrete developed state is exposed to natural destructive force is... probably a must to remind people and it's state government not to underestimate what kind of scenarios could happened when such forces strikes. Of course depending on strength, some parts could often be regarded by audiences that it looked, exaggerating.
Most audiences would see it as entertainment anyway...

So, the sequel may not need to be a continual development of characters, since 2 of 'em had passed away. However, should there be... probably the project team going or should be cooking up a character who should be 18yrs old, a legitimately off-spring of Bill. That could be either "Jo's" junior or the junior of "Melissa Reeves", where the former had got back together with "Bill" after their adventure getting through the Twisters attack, and the latter whom had been "humped" with "Bill"...

Ever since TWISTER, the one and only flick that deals with Stormy side of natural force without human manipulation, goes to INTO THE STORM. Which in contrast to TWISTER, a little less popular... without the "stellar" casts...

Tom Cruise What GIF
 

WillG

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2003
Messages
7,569
I’m sure there will be no preachy/lecture-y messages about climate change in this one
 

Colin Jacobson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
13,328
Don't forget that there is also no Phillip Seymour Hoffman who was a big part of the first film.

Ehh, he's superfluous to the story. I don't think he had a "big part" at all. You could lose that character and the movie would be no different at all.

Unless I'm forgetting something. Haven't seen the movie in a while.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,070
Messages
5,130,035
Members
144,283
Latest member
Nielmb
Recent bookmarks
0
Top