- Joined
- Jun 10, 2003
- Messages
- 26,385
- Real Name
- Josh Steinberg
After having revisited the season a couple times, I’ve grown to like much more than I dislike.
The Lorca thing, for me, just felt like a missed opportunity. I think from a storytelling point of view, the “persona” represented a kind of damaged captain we’ve never seen as a Trek lead before, and it was interesting to see them breaking new ground. The twist was shocking for a moment, but when that shock wears off, I felt that I was left with “he’s bad cause all Mirror Universe guys are bad” and that just felt like much less complex and less interesting storytelling.
It was sort of the same with Ash Tyler. A Starfleet officer suffering PTSD and trying to recover his life is a genuinely more interesting and fresh type of character for Trek than “he’s messed up cause he’s not really that character and sci-fi stuff”.
I think the show laid the groundwork for both so you can watch it and clearly see that they’ve constructed the storyline properly for those twists to be honestly done. I just think the original versions as first presented to the audience were more compelling characters and scenarios.
And as a more general note, I thought going back to that same twist two different times in the same season was just using the same storytelling device too often. I think they should have picked one character to do it with and not gone back to the same well again in the same story.
But it is what it is and they’re not fatal choices to me, just perhaps not the ones I would have found most interesting.
The Lorca thing, for me, just felt like a missed opportunity. I think from a storytelling point of view, the “persona” represented a kind of damaged captain we’ve never seen as a Trek lead before, and it was interesting to see them breaking new ground. The twist was shocking for a moment, but when that shock wears off, I felt that I was left with “he’s bad cause all Mirror Universe guys are bad” and that just felt like much less complex and less interesting storytelling.
It was sort of the same with Ash Tyler. A Starfleet officer suffering PTSD and trying to recover his life is a genuinely more interesting and fresh type of character for Trek than “he’s messed up cause he’s not really that character and sci-fi stuff”.
I think the show laid the groundwork for both so you can watch it and clearly see that they’ve constructed the storyline properly for those twists to be honestly done. I just think the original versions as first presented to the audience were more compelling characters and scenarios.
And as a more general note, I thought going back to that same twist two different times in the same season was just using the same storytelling device too often. I think they should have picked one character to do it with and not gone back to the same well again in the same story.
But it is what it is and they’re not fatal choices to me, just perhaps not the ones I would have found most interesting.