Dave Falasco
Screenwriter
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2000
- Messages
- 1,185
Amen, Halleluiah, and pass the corn chips, Romier! Good post as always.
Assuming a 25% market share for Xbox results in 3.5 million consoles sold instead of 2.5 million. If each console results in four titles sold, this is an incremental increase of 4 million XBox games sold, which along with the peripherals, should more than offset the $100 loss per unit
The thing is, with the sales being as bad as they are in Europe, Japan, and now America, plus a price drop in each territory less than a year from its launch, that $100 loss per unit is going to get a lot bigger. Especially since they started giving money back to people who bought X-Boxes in Europe.
Microsoft had an inflated price-cut balloon just waiting to burst during E3. Sony played their cards smartly by letting the industry know it wasn't planning on any price cut, inflating Microsofts balloon even more. Then a week before the big E3 announcement, Sony deflates the air surround Microsofts price drop by getting theirs out first.
Amusingly, if you reverse the company names, and Microsoft had done this, there would have been cries of MS sucks and all sorts of other interesting things. Sony does it and they get praised.
The GCN isn't in third place. Its being quiet, yes, but its not in third. Its more of a quiet second, actually, based on the sales charts for games.
hehe this stuff is great. Morgan you need an Xbox to clear some of that Nintendo brain washing out. I swear they put subliminal messages in their games.
Dean
The GCN isn't in third place. Its being quiet, yes, but its not in third. Its more of a quiet second, actually, based on the sales charts for games. Making the PS2 and X-Box $200 does take away some of the GCN's competitive advantage.
Show me one link that shows the Gamecube is currently ahead of the XBox in total console sales in the United States. The Gamecube is bringing up the rear. All you talked about Morgan prior to the launch of Xbox and the GC was that the Xbox was priced too high relative to the Gamecube. Now you say the $100 price advantage that the GC enjoys is no big deal. Typical. Countless parents out there have probably bought the GC over the Xbox when doing price comparison after Little Johnny said he wanted an Xbox or GC.
Now you say the $100 price advantage that the GC enjoys is no big deal. Typical
The X-Box doesn't have exclusive titles with brand recognition like Nintendo does. That was also one of my reasons for getting a GameCube over an X-Box.
The X-Box doesn't have exclusive titles with brand recognition like Nintendo does
Didn't Nintendo have 15+ years to develop those "brands" such as Mario, Zelda, Metroid, etc... How can you knock against the XBox on that aspect after being in existence for all of 6 months?
btw, to chose a bad game with a "brandname" over a good one without a "brandname" seems like a bad move. Halo has no recognizable "brand"...thank god that didn't prevent me from playing it.