The reason I ask is because I was just over at the IMDB browsing the user comments area, and someone mentioned that 'ROTLD' was filmed for 1.37:1 so that Dan O Bannon could save money!? I don't know how accurate this info is, but the more I think about it, the more it makes no sense, I mean how is it costing more money to simply compose for 1.85:1 within the frame, and providing instructions for the proper matting when the prints reach the theater? It shouldn't really cost any additional money right? I tried doing a search for this films AR, but turned up nothing. I know that the dvd coming out is going to be anamorphic, and presented at 1.85:1, THAT seems more accurate to me. Anybody know if what this guy said is true? I don't think it is though, at least I hope it's not, or the dvd will be in the wrong aspect ratio!