I've posted elsewhere in this forum about Sony hardware. I'm contemplating the transition to a high definition flat screen soon, though I'm torn between Plasma and LCD. As space considerations are a prime factor, I can't go larger than 40" which for me is pushing it.
PLASMA Displays:
Plasmas seem to begin at 42" though I did find one smaller that might work - the Panasonic TH-37PX60U. This would probably fit in my proposed setup. Any reviews/comments on this one?
Plasma would probably do better for me. I have controlled lighting. However, I worry about the power consumption (325 W). That's almost double an LCD I'm considering and I also wonder how it does in warmer environments.
Most of all is the dreaded "burn-in" issue. Their site documents a 100 hour "break-in" period (1-1.5 months for me I think).The prospect of ever stretching or distorting the image seems repellant to me (replacing one problem with another - why do people settle for this nonsense!).
A question here: are the bars at sides (for conventional 1.33:1 TV) and at top and bottom for widescreen films a problem over 2 or 3 hours viewing? Also, let's say you do fill the screen what do you do about the blasted network logos that sit there in the corner while you watch shows possibly for hours (movies, etc.). You can't eliminate those. Is any of this a worry?
LCD Displays:
I'm also looking at a SONY KDLV32XBR2 (XBR3 soon?) and some of the Sharp displays at this size (32"). I'm leaning towards the LCDs for enhanced selected and size, which would fit my setup better.
My first concerns here are Response Rate & Refresh time. An A/V salesman with some smarts informed me that this has come to a point where it isn't all that noticeable anymore. The smears and other gross artifacts of yesterday are mostly gone. Is this true? It's mostly a lack of detail or softness that betrays inferior rates now.
The other problem is of course black level and the contrast, which I don't think can ever be resolved completely. It is simply a built-in weakness of the format. It's nice that they're making progress (by very small degrees in my view) but it's ultimately a fruitless exercise.
I'm writing another novel folks, sorry. Bringing this all to a close: any personal advice on Plasma vs. LCD and the models I listed (Panasonic TH-37PX60U, SONY KDLV32XBR2 and the Sharp 32" line) is very much appreciated.
PLASMA Displays:
Plasmas seem to begin at 42" though I did find one smaller that might work - the Panasonic TH-37PX60U. This would probably fit in my proposed setup. Any reviews/comments on this one?
Plasma would probably do better for me. I have controlled lighting. However, I worry about the power consumption (325 W). That's almost double an LCD I'm considering and I also wonder how it does in warmer environments.
Most of all is the dreaded "burn-in" issue. Their site documents a 100 hour "break-in" period (1-1.5 months for me I think).The prospect of ever stretching or distorting the image seems repellant to me (replacing one problem with another - why do people settle for this nonsense!).
A question here: are the bars at sides (for conventional 1.33:1 TV) and at top and bottom for widescreen films a problem over 2 or 3 hours viewing? Also, let's say you do fill the screen what do you do about the blasted network logos that sit there in the corner while you watch shows possibly for hours (movies, etc.). You can't eliminate those. Is any of this a worry?
LCD Displays:
I'm also looking at a SONY KDLV32XBR2 (XBR3 soon?) and some of the Sharp displays at this size (32"). I'm leaning towards the LCDs for enhanced selected and size, which would fit my setup better.
My first concerns here are Response Rate & Refresh time. An A/V salesman with some smarts informed me that this has come to a point where it isn't all that noticeable anymore. The smears and other gross artifacts of yesterday are mostly gone. Is this true? It's mostly a lack of detail or softness that betrays inferior rates now.
The other problem is of course black level and the contrast, which I don't think can ever be resolved completely. It is simply a built-in weakness of the format. It's nice that they're making progress (by very small degrees in my view) but it's ultimately a fruitless exercise.
I'm writing another novel folks, sorry. Bringing this all to a close: any personal advice on Plasma vs. LCD and the models I listed (Panasonic TH-37PX60U, SONY KDLV32XBR2 and the Sharp 32" line) is very much appreciated.