SamT
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2010
- Messages
- 5,827
- Real Name
- Sam
Title: Indiana Jones 5 (2022)
Genre: Action, Adventure
Director: James Mangold
Cast: Harrison Ford
Release: 2022-07-29
Genre: Action, Adventure
Director: James Mangold
Cast: Harrison Ford
Release: 2022-07-29
After "Crystal Skulls", they probably don't want Lucas involved in the story!It's Lucas who comes up with the story. He was a major influence. What you saw was Lucas' stories.
After "Crystal Skulls", they probably don't want Lucas involved in the story!
Unfortunately, the Star Wars prequel haters have managed to make it that he's not even allowed to get credit when he deserves it anymore. [NERD VOICE]"According to The Secret History Of Star Wars, Marcia Lucas & Gary Kurtz are the only reason why Star Wars was any good."[/NERD VOICE]It's Lucas who comes up with the story. He was a major influence. What you saw was Lucas' stories.
Raiders of the Lost Ark takes place in 1936, Temple of Doom is 1935, The Last Crusade is 1938, Fate of Atlantis I think is 1939, and after that I start drawing a blank.So if the first film was set in 1936, this should technically be set in 1974, though I'm guessing the '60s is more likely.
Yeah. Do they already have another Marvel movie coming in April or May 2019?I bet this means Disney moves their Inhumans movie, currently scheduled for July 12, 2019. They wouldn't put two of their own blockbusters a week apart.
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull had a lot of problems, but the story wasn't one of them. My two biggest complaints were the over-reliance on bad CG and a screenplay that overstuffed and tonally inconsistent.After "Crystal Skulls", they probably don't want Lucas involved in the story!
Well, Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was set in 1957, so if this is set eleven years later, it'd be set in 1968. You get too far into the twentieth century, and the world starts really shrinking in a way that undermines the mystique of these movies.So if the first film was set in 1936, this should technically be set in 1974, though I'm guessing the '60s is more likely.
Lucas not being a part of it justifies doing the movie, IMHO. It was Lucas's kooky ideas about flying saucers, and they way they were handled, that fractured the last movie. Hopefully without that Lucas brand of kookiness destroying their script, Spielberg and Ford can do something worthwhile.George Lucas back, not back? There is a suggestion that he is not named in the Disney's announcement and they want to use someone else.