Take photos too of cabling, just in case.
I labeled all my cables before swapping out my last receiver. It made the exchange easier. Denon included labels with the new receiver, so I didn't even need to buy anything.Take photos too of cabling, just in case.
I wasn't expecting the same playback level (meaning, I didn't expect 70 on the old pre to be the same as 70 on the new one) once they were set, but just that the relative levels would be the same. I'm not sure how to explain it. For example, if one channel, using the same speaker and the same power amp needed to be set 3dB lower than another with one preamp, I would expect it to still need to be set 3dB lower with another preamp to play back at the same level, still using the same speaker and same power amp. It just didn't turn out that way. Even the sub was a little different.John, I wondered if your level settings would carry over to the new processor. I have never had separates, so wasn't sure, but it seemed like a big assumption that they would be the same.
I would suggest giving Audyssey a try just to see if you end up liking the results - - you can always turn it off if you don't like it. The program has really been improved over the years. I was very pleased with the results compared with the MCACC auto calibration from my old Pioneer Elite receiver.
Too bad I don't live near you, I'd happily take the MKII, and you could get a 7703/4 (8805??) instead. I quite liked the 7702MKII (no experience with '03/4), but I didn't pay attention for a short while and they completely disappeared, that's how product availability tends to be in Canada. Also Denon/Marantz don't "clear out" the more premium models, they just don't stockpile many here so I guess not many to get rid of i.e. the 7703 and 7704 are the same price here. IOW, if you wanted to go to the trouble, your MKII would likely get a much better buck in Canada.I'm glad to see that Marantz prepro's can be gotten more affordably. But I'm bummed that the resale value on my 7702mkII will be minimal.
They have their upgrade Auro 3D version, whatever that is, but it costs $200.
I've just done it so many times through the decades, and I know what I like. Auro 3D is included at no extra cost with the AV7704, FWIW. I haven't completely dialed it in yet. With time, I'll fine tune the EQ of specific channels to get them to integrate better, but they're blending better without any EQ than with the old pre. It just seems that the processing is significantly better with the Marantz, which shouldn't be a surprise. As much as I like Emotiva gear, the Sherbourn (which was part of Emotiva at the time) just doesn't get the high tech part as well as bigger, more capable companies like Marantz. That's why I had decided some time back that when I upgraded my processor, it wouldn't be an Emotiva and most likely would be Marantz.Impressive! Let's just say it took me longer to integrate my 7702MKII. I don't get why Auro 3D is a paid upgrade either. Of the available immersive formats it's the oldest and the only one that isn't Object-Based. Add to that the absolute dearth of consumer level software and there's just no reason I can see to pay for it. Perhaps Marantz was just trying to hedge their bets in case the format ever catches on.
I'm getting the impressions I can switch between my custom setup and Audyssey for direct comparison. I just need to confirm how.
I haven't dug into it, but it seems to be a decoding system using height channels, but doesn't have anything to do with specific encoding. Atmos/DTS:X have kind of replaced it, especially when it comes to playing back regular 5/7.1 soundtracks.I didn’t upgrade my 7702mkII to Auro3D. I don’t know what it is and it’s never listed in blu-ray / UHD boxes so don’t know why I’d want it.
Definitely try out the Audyssey, but be prepared to spend a little time with it. Don't accept your first run, play with the mic positions a bit until you get a feel for it, then you'll know what mic positions make sense for your room/taste. Perhaps obviously, if it's mostly just you listening (or only you who cares about sound...), use positions all around your listening seat (I mean all around, in back too). Use all the mic positions allowed, don't skimp at 4 or 6 etc.
Once you find the "magic" mic positions, somehow mark or keep track of them
To have on-screen help for mic positions, which would really help a lot of people (if not everybody, at first), you'd essentially have to input a floor plan that includes your significant furniture, where people are sitting, possibly the "specs" of your furniture (absorption/reflection/sitting height/etc.), the physical location and number of real subs (you could have 4 on two outputs, not uncommon), etc. etc. That would take some sophisticated processing (it'll come...), and would probably be more work for the user to input than just winging it a few times. I know, I know, a 3D camera connected to Audyssey, object recognition algorithms, test pings to see what the furniture is made of...This is one of the things I find mysterious about the Audyssey process. I've read a bunch of primers over the years about how to run Audyssey but I have yet to read a good explanation of the mic placement thing. I always figured they should have on-screen diagrams or something...