1. Sign-up to become a member, and most of the ads you see will disappear. It only takes 30 seconds to sign up, so join the discussion today!
    Dismiss Notice

3D HTF TOP 30 MUST OWN 3D TITLES

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Ronald Epstein, Dec 12, 2010.

  1. Tino

    Tino Executive Producer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    17,325
    Likes Received:
    8,854
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Metro NYC
    Real Name:
    Valentino
    I love John Carter. Terrific fun.
     
    Panman40 and Johnny Angell like this.
  2. Johnny Angell

    Johnny Angell Played With Dinosaurs Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 1998
    Messages:
    11,544
    Likes Received:
    3,704
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Central Arkansas
    Real Name:
    Johnny Angell
    I just wish the costuming had been more authentic to the novel. ;)
     
  3. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    18,028
    Likes Received:
    22,025
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    That was a 2D-only feature.
     
    Jimbo64 likes this.
  4. Colin Jacobson

    Colin Jacobson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    9,527
    Likes Received:
    3,282
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    I didn't think it was much of a movie, but the writer's claim that it singlehandedly killed 3D is insane.

    There must be what, 30 movies a year that run 3D? Yet the author states they're essentially non-existent!
     
  5. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    18,028
    Likes Received:
    22,025
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    Not to mention... John Carter, released March 2012.

    Marvel’s The Avengers... released in 3D in May 2012, has the then-biggest opening of all time.

    Life Of Pi... released fall 2012 in 3D, wins Oscar for Best Director.

    Gravity... released fall 2013 in 3D, sets record for singlehandedly grosses $1 million from 3D showings at single IMAX flagship location (in addition to wide box office success), wins Oscar for cinematography.

    The only thing you can take from John Carter flopping is that people weren’t terribly interested in John Carter.
     
  6. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    34,301
    Likes Received:
    11,565
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    Yeah, a movie can't turn people off of 3-D when no one saw it.
     
    Stephen_J_H and Josh Steinberg like this.
  7. Edwin-S

    Edwin-S Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    Messages:
    8,378
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    No one? I wonder what I was watching when I saw it in the theater? <_<
     
    TravisR likes this.
  8. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    34,301
    Likes Received:
    11,565
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    Fair enough. "...when so few people saw it?" :)
     
  9. Edwin-S

    Edwin-S Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    Messages:
    8,378
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    That's better. :laugh:
     
    TravisR likes this.
  10. TJPC

    TJPC Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2016
    Messages:
    3,560
    Likes Received:
    3,098
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Hamilton Ontario
    Real Name:
    Terry Carroll
    I still use John Carter as one of my demonstration discs, especially the air battles. I was and am mystified by its poor box office.
     
  11. Edwin-S

    Edwin-S Lead Actor
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    Messages:
    8,378
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    I think a small part of it was the title. It was dull and unimaginative. I can imagine some people reading it and thinking to themselves that it made the film sound boring.

    The trailers also may not have helped. They were not exactly exciting.
     
  12. StephenDH

    StephenDH Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    475
    Trophy Points:
    610
    Location:
    UK
    Real Name:
    Stephen
    The people marketing "John Carter" were planks who had probably never heard of Edgar Rice Burroughs or his characters.
     
    Johnny Angell likes this.
  13. Colin Jacobson

    Colin Jacobson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    9,527
    Likes Received:
    3,282
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Biggest issue: it just wasn't a very good movie. It's not AWFUL but it feels like corporate filmmaking, as it lacks a personality.

    The movie clearly lost money, but it wasn't a total bomb. It made close to $300m WW - well below what it needed to turn a profit but not exactly chump change!

    Even if "JC" only made 27 cents, it still didn't kill 3D, which is what makes that author's claim so stupid...
     
  14. Message #11134 of 11401 Jan 3, 2020
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2020
    Malcolm R

    Malcolm R Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Messages:
    18,140
    Likes Received:
    4,906
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    Yes, most blamed the marketing, at least in part, for the failure of JC:
    I also think casting Taylor Kitsch in the lead role was not a good choice.

    Director Andrew Stanton was also responsible for the change to a more generic title:
    On the upside, Michael Giacchino did win a couple of awards for his film score on JC.
     
    Stephen_J_H likes this.
  15. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Director
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    21,525
    Likes Received:
    11,055
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    Yeah, pretty much a total bomb, at least from the studio's vantage point. Accounts in the trades at the time said the write off was close to $200 million on John Carter. (Negative costs were close to $200 million, and Disney spent close to that on marketing.)

    But you're certainly right that its failure didn't kill 3D. Lots of movies then and since have been shown very successfully in 3D.
     
  16. Mark McSherry

    Mark McSherry Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2013
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    228
    Trophy Points:
    110
    Real Name:
    Mark McSherry
    I believe what Glenn Erickson wrote at the end of 2013 in a DVDSavant column encapsulates what happened with John Carter.

    ==============================================================================

    "Well, 2013 slipped away pretty fast, a topic I already covered in my Best-of 2013 Article. But it ended with a real surprise a couple of days ago, when I finally caught up with 2012's John Carter. I realize that this is not much of an endorsement of Savant as a source that always has the best advice on new movies -- I saw Pacific Rim right away last summer and didn't care for it at all. John Carter should be a key sci-fi title, my specialty, and I let it get away.

    "But about 18 months ago I remember standing outside Disney's El Capitan Theater in Hollywood during the 2012 TCMfest, saying that I ought to see this in 3D while I can. It was doing no business, yet I hadn't heard or seen anything about it that offended me. I had heard all the reasons why John Carter didn't do well -- no stars, no pre-sold franchise, no "of Mars" in the title -- and walked away. Well, on Blu-ray it's marvelous. Edgar Rice Burroughs' hundred-year-old tale is the blueprint for swashbuckling space opera and the construction of not just a character but an entire alien world. The only reason nobody's made it into a movie until now is that the outlandish character designs were unfilmable before the advent of CGI. Director Andrew Stanton may have muffed the marketing rollout but his movie is every bit as good as Finding Nemo and Wall-E; it makes all the Frank Frazetta- like costuming and space opera court shenanigans fun again, like a smarter, less campy Flash Gordon. The 1880s-era setting works well, as does the fantasy mechanisms that transport Carter to "Barsoom" and plunk him down amid a fun world of four-armed nomads, eight-legged steeds and an agreeably loyal frog-dog that covers ground faster than The Road Runner. Why didn't smarter fans than I clobber me with assurances that "I have to see this one?" Or wasn't I listening?

    "What Andrew Stanton's movie gets at, is an evocation of an earlier era's ideas of fantastic delight. I haven't seen many filmmakers do this well ...Walt Disney and Karel Zeman come to mind as exceptions. Burroughs' books transported a zillion young readers to a new world, surely inspiring Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers, 'franchises' that came along much later. And we easily see Burroughs' Barsoom tales in later-generation "create a world" fantasies like Dune, Gor and Star Wars. It's no wonder that several decades' worth of pulp sci-fi/fantasy fiction emulated Burroughs, especially their lurid covers featuring sword-wielding heroes and curvaceous space princesses. Stanton's film is actually an adaptation of the first John Carter book Princess of Mars --- maybe they should have just made the title "John Carter and the Princess of Mars." With a title like that we'd know that it has to be good.

    "Stanton said that the original John Carter stories had a weak serialized format in print, and that the really difficult problem was finding a workable 3-act structure for his movie version. For me, the constant flow of entertaining content overcomes my resistance to the story of a cruel warlord forcing a marriage with the feisty princess -- amusing & interesting alien creatures, genuinely witty jokes, refreshingly impressive visuals and novel action scenes. In essence I was charmed, as if watching an eye-dazzling sci-fi fantasy fairy tale. If anything John Carter is too good for today's audience, that seemingly cannot let a story sink in, nor appreciate finesse and real wit in giant action epics. After those Star Wars prequels, this is great stuff: it even has real dialogue.

    "So I feel rather ashamed, not having seen and championed John Carter when it was new. I'll be looking for an opportunity to see it in 3D some day. I hereby adopt it as another 'Savant' movie -- the kind of deserving picture unjustly pilloried and dismissed on release, like Joe Versus the Volcano, or Until the End of the World."
     
    Jeff Flugel and phillyrobt like this.
  17. Mysto

    Mysto Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2018
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    2,331
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    marv long
    I think one of the problems with John Carter has been duplicated several times. Popular characters and themes that have slipped from the public's consciousness don't perform that well.
    John Carter - The Shadow - The Phantom - etc. One could argue the films could have been better (I agree) but there were some stinker superman and batman offerings yet they kept making them.
     
    Jeff Flugel likes this.
  18. Panman40

    Panman40 Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    2,036
    Likes Received:
    1,279
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Real Name:
    Martin Campbell
    i don’t believe Johns post had anything to do with politics, he was just sticking up for 3D.
    I will leave it there though.
     
    John Sparks likes this.
  19. Colin Jacobson

    Colin Jacobson Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    9,527
    Likes Received:
    3,282
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Maybe, but here in the US, it's members of one political group who call the WaPo a dishonest rag.

    You don't have to follow that tribe to criticize WaPo mistakes, but broad comments about how you "can't believe anything" in the "rag" are political 99% of the time in today's US climate...
     
    Johnny Angell, TravisR and Tino like this.
  20. John Sparks

    John Sparks Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2001
    Messages:
    3,053
    Likes Received:
    1,716
    Trophy Points:
    4,110
    Location:
    Menifee, CA
    Real Name:
    John Sparks
    ...and on to other movies. I double dipped on this because I really liked it, but the 3D wasn't that good, but the 7.1 audio was! Next up will be THOR: THE DARK WORLD. :thumbsup: :3dglasses:

    [​IMG]
     
    Panman40 likes this.

Share This Page