What's new

DVD Review HTF REVIEW: The Big Town (1 Viewer)

Nestor_Ramos

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 8, 2001
Messages
86


The Big Town


Studio: Columbia Tri-Star
Year: 1987
Rated: R
Film Length: 110 Minutes
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1 Anamorphic
Audio: DD 2.0
Color/B&W: color
Languages: English
Subtitles: English
MSRP: $24.96
Release Date: September 28


The Feature
:star: :star:
Roger Ebert is fond of saying that films should be judged not on what they’re about, but on how they’re about it. I tend to agree, but “The Big Town” argues strongly against that statement.

“The Big Town” is a movie about a young man who is very good at shooting dice. Now, right there I have a problem. It is not possible to be “good” at rolling dice. It is possible to be good at craps, but only to the extent that one knows the odds for any given situation. “The Big Town” makes a half-hearted attempt to make that distinction, but then shows Matt Dillon rolling seven again and again to illustrate his prowess.

Were this movie about poker – or backgammon, for that matter – I would’ve bought it. But, aside from flipping a coin, nothing could be more arbitrary than rolling dice again and again. To suggest that this man has some great knack for rolling sevens (or elevens, or fours, or whatever) is simply too ludicrous a premise for me to accept in the context of a gritty, realistic noir film.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. Dillon plays Cully, a small town kid who travels to Chicago to work for a woman who bankrolls top-flight dice players for a modest 70% of the profits. If he’s so good, why does he need someone taking 70% of his earnings? The boss mumbles something about needing her to keep from being called a cheater. OK. Mostly, she’s just a plot device with her very own boring and pointless subplot.

Her husband is a blind dude with a severe attitude problem. From the minute we set eyes on him, we know he’ll be trouble. He is.

Cully, in the process of rolling seven again and again, runs afoul of a local semi-mobster (Tommy Lee Jones) who runs a high-stakes local game. The scenes in which Cully plays in these games will be completely baffling to anyone who doesn’t know the rules of craps.

Exacerbating the situation is Cully’s relationship with the mobster’s girlfriend, (Diane Lane) a stripper of dubious moral fiber. Lane is gorgeous, and her presence is one of the few things to recommend this film.

Also above average are the film’s performances. This is an extraordinary cast, though Jones and Dillon both go over the top now and then (watch Jones spin the cap of a liquor bottle onto the floor, then begin drinking – uh, you might need that later). The plot is a sturdy old formula, but it hasn’t aged well. It’s a shame, because the pieces are here for an effective and intelligent genre picture. But that’s all they are – pieces.

Please note that reviews at the time of this film’s release were generally favorable. As far as I’m concerned, it has aged very badly, to the point of irrelevance.

Video
:star: 1/2

This transfer is plagued by graininess, bad black levels and bland color balance. Some of that is intentional – this is a noir, after all. If that’s the case, though, why not shoot in black and white? Some shots exhibit pleasing detail, such as in the knap on the blind man’s tweed jacket, and his slightly misshapen mustache.

Audio
:star: 1/2
The best I can say about this 2.0 soundtrack is that you can usually hear what people are saying. Otherwise, a lot of the mix is muddy and hissy, with no punch. It’s a dialog-driven movie, but the 2.0 track isn’t even encoded for Pro Logic.

Special Features
Zero stars

Ain’t none.


Conclusion
:star: 1/2

This is a catalog release for Sony, and in that respect, it’s always good to see another title find its way to DVD. If this film has a following, I’m not aware of it. In fact, I don’t remember having ever heard of this film before it darkened my door. For fans of the actors involved, or those interested in the subject matter, by all means, enjoy. But everything about this release screams half-baked, from the bland transfer to the complete lack of features. As I said, the performances are fine, and the plot is a classic storyline. But the devil is in the details.
 

Michael Osadciw

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
1,460
Real Name
Michael Osadciw
wow! that's the lowest star rating I've ever seen on a title! it must really suck! lol

Mike
 

Robert Crawford

Crawdaddy
Moderator
Patron
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 9, 1998
Messages
67,890
Location
Michigan
Real Name
Robert

I always liked this film and I don't understand you saying it aged badly, when the time of the film took place in the 1950s, but the film wasn't made until 1987. So what's changed over the last 17 years to cause you to say the film aged badly?

By the way, I think Columbia has pulled this dvd from release, Lasersedge our forum sponsor, no longer shows a release date for it.



Crawdaddy
 

Dick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 22, 1999
Messages
9,937
Real Name
Rick
At $24.95 for a second-rate title, I should hope they would pull the release, until they can get it out here for $10-15!! Sony strikes (out) again.
 

Martin Jeeves

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 18, 2000
Messages
694
I also liked this film. The performances are excellent and I felt it had a nostalgic edge and built up suspense quite nicely. The Diane Lane nude fan dance was cool.

What has heppened to this DVD? It seems to have disappointed from all the online dealers!????:angry:
 

Martin Jeeves

Supporting Actor
Joined
Oct 18, 2000
Messages
694
This DVD is still coming out. It was delayed due to music rights issues but should come out shortly once they are resolved.:emoji_thumbsup:
 

Nestor_Ramos

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 8, 2001
Messages
86
Jeeves -- agreed on Diane Lane and her, ah, performance(s) here.

I say it aged badly partly because the image of dice games has changed drastically (Anybody see "World Series of Dice" on the Chappelle show? Hilarious!). Also, my perception of fifties lowlife is different from what it was in 1987. This characters who prowled the illegal gambling establishments were surely much rougher -- and not nearly as cool -- as they appear in this film.

Maybe I was rougher on the transfer than I should have been, because I found the film so irritating. But it's certainly not a good transfer, by any stretch.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,068
Messages
5,129,976
Members
144,283
Latest member
Nielmb
Recent bookmarks
0
Top