Bill B Conner
Auditioning
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2003
- Messages
- 4
Some friends and I are debating where a sound wave developes: at the cone, or away from the cone.
Away from the Cone:
Now I was always under the impression that before you hear the tone the wave has to develope. An 18" subwoofer needs more space for a wave to develope then a 10", etc. I could be wrong, but that's always what I thought. Once the tone is made, its all the same shape in relation but a cone that is twice the size of a another cone makes an actual wave that is twice as tall but the same shape (making the same sound).
At the Cone:
The other theory is that ""when sound emanates from a loudspeaker (or a trumpet or the fat lady singing) the sound IS THE SOUND as it leaves the source!" He states that if you put your ear right up to an 18" subwoofer that is making a 30Hz tone, you will hear it and that "A sound does not need the wave to DEVELOP!"
We can't seem to agree, so I thought I would involve a third party. I see his logic, but I was always under the impression that the it was away from the cone, not at the cone.
Anyways, what's the real story?
Thanks a lot in advance,
-Bill
Away from the Cone:
Now I was always under the impression that before you hear the tone the wave has to develope. An 18" subwoofer needs more space for a wave to develope then a 10", etc. I could be wrong, but that's always what I thought. Once the tone is made, its all the same shape in relation but a cone that is twice the size of a another cone makes an actual wave that is twice as tall but the same shape (making the same sound).
At the Cone:
The other theory is that ""when sound emanates from a loudspeaker (or a trumpet or the fat lady singing) the sound IS THE SOUND as it leaves the source!" He states that if you put your ear right up to an 18" subwoofer that is making a 30Hz tone, you will hear it and that "A sound does not need the wave to DEVELOP!"
We can't seem to agree, so I thought I would involve a third party. I see his logic, but I was always under the impression that the it was away from the cone, not at the cone.
Anyways, what's the real story?
Thanks a lot in advance,
-Bill