What's new

EAC woes (1 Viewer)

Daren Welsh

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Messages
660
I'm listening to a set of WAV's right now and they seem just fine. I've got two HD's, each on their own ATA-100 bus and two CD drives, each on their own IDE bus.
 

Kimmo Jaskari

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 27, 2000
Messages
1,528
Are you running something odd that might conflict with lame? Try shutting down as many of your running programs as possible, including stuff that sits in the taskbars lower right hand corner.
 

Daren Welsh

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Messages
660
Well, I can't friggin believe it, but I think the problem with LAME was that I was overclocking. I pulled back my fsb to the default 133 MHz and everything seems to be working fine now. *shrug* Don't ask me how changing the bus speed can so drastically affect a program that should be able to work on so many different hardware configurations.

Now that I've actually got it working (knock on wood), I have a question about the EAC implemenation of LAME. Under EAC compression options, there's a spot to put in additional command line options. The default is "%l--alt-preset 128%l%h--alt-preset standard%h %s %d" (minus the quotes). Can someone spell out what each of these parameters does? When I try to just delete the entire line, LAME spouts a syntax error. I guess I could just rip WAV's with EAC and then manually use RazorLame later, but I figure I might as well automate it all using EAC now. So how would I set the additional command line options to do the highest quality VBR MP3 possible? Also, what's the difference between stereo and J-stereo?
 

Kimmo Jaskari

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 27, 2000
Messages
1,528
Well, lame is very computation intensive obviously. I'm betting that if you were to run something like seti@home to run the CPU at 100% continuously you'd start seeing problems as well.
You were pushing your system beyond its rated specs, so no wonder things started happening that shouldn't.
My personal opinion about overclocking is that I'll take stability over a few extra percent performance any day of the week. Of course, that's just me.
Tons of good info about MP3 encoding etc at http://www.r3mix.net !
 

Daren Welsh

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Messages
660
Actually, I had RC5 running for a month or two and I never had problems with it (while overclocking 133->147 FSB). I even set it up to use both of my CPUs. If you're not familiar with RC5, it basically uses spare CPU cycles to run its algorithm. So my CPUs were both churning at 100% 24/7 and I'd be stable.
 

Max Leung

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2000
Messages
4,611
Darren, Lame is and EAC running simultaneously is very disk intensive too. Heck, running Lame alone will also use the hard drive. On an overclocked system, you're running an app that makes use of an overclocked IDE bus, overclocked CPU, AND an overclocked FSB. RC5 or Seti@home hardly use the IDE bus at all, and hence you didn't detect the problem. When both are working hard, then you start seeing problems!
Timing problems pushing data onto and from the IDE bus while retrieving and compressing data, which corrupts the data pulled from the .WAV file. You are very lucky you didn't corrupt your hard drive!
Scared? Not nearly enough. :D
 

Kimmo Jaskari

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 27, 2000
Messages
1,528
Yup, that is one of the biggest "scares" of overclocking the PCI bus too - possible hard drive problems due to the bus running faster than spec. Well, that and potential instability especially under high load. Like I said, IMHO, overclocking is pointless these days, unless one enjoys trading away stability and getting an undetectably faster machine. :)
Of course, really nutty overclocking projects can be fun just for the sake of doing it; we're talking stuff like water cooling or refrigeration etc, that can be kind of fun.
 

Kimmo Jaskari

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 27, 2000
Messages
1,528
You want to extract the entire CD as one big file?

Hmm, never tried doing that, not sure if you can.

Well, you can always rip the tracks and stitch them together with third party software and then encode the resulting single wave file with Lame, but that's a bit work intensive.
 

Rob Gillespie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 17, 1998
Messages
3,632
Click on Action then Copy Image & Create CUE Sheet.
The CD will be extracted as one big .wav file.
There's also Copy Range which allows you to define the start and end points.
 

Rob Gillespie

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 17, 1998
Messages
3,632
It's a text file detailing the track break points and gap lengths. EAC can use it to burn a .wav file to CD-R as a proper CD rather than just as one file. It's inconsequential to what you're trying to do.
 

Daren Welsh

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Messages
660
One last question (I hope): If I selected "compressed" from the menu selection you told me to try, it says it uses an external compressor (.mp3) ... so does that mean it'll use LAME with the settings I've been using for my standard CDs?
 

Daren Welsh

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Messages
660
Well I just tried it and it worked great. By selecting "compressed" it automatically used LAME with my settings to encode the temp .wav file. I just listened to the first 10 minutes of the mp3 and it seems to be perfect :)
Thx for the help.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,063
Messages
5,129,881
Members
144,281
Latest member
papill6n
Recent bookmarks
0
Top