Details: Peter Pan (2003) (1 Viewer)

[TomWoodward]

Hey

Universal have announced Peter Pan for release on the 4th May in seperate anamorphic widescreen and full screen editions. Each should retail at around $26.98. I'm afraid we don't have the official artwork yet but the full specs are attached below:

2.40:1 Anamorphic Widescreen Transfer
English Dolby Digital 5.1 Track
French Dolby Digital 5.1 Track
Peter Pan: Darling House
- Alternate Ending (4mins 28)
- Deleted Scene: Mr Darling in the Dog House (3mins 48)
- Me & My Shadow (1min 16)
- In the Dog House with Nana (2mins 45)
Peter Pan: Home Under the Ground
- Dig Under the Home (50secs)
- The Legacy of Pan: The Making of Peter Pan (10mins 59)
- The Duchess's Outtakes (2mins 4)
- Lost Boys on the Set (2mins 2)
- DVD Credits (32secs)
Peter Pan: Neverland Forest
- Explore the Forest (55secs)
- Tinkerbell: Behind the Fairy Dust Featurette (4mins 36)
- I Do Believe in Fairies (1min 29)
- Princess Tiger Lily (58secs)
Peter Pan: Pirate's Ship
- Board the Pirate Ship (58secs)
- Through the Eyes of Hook (6mins 19)
- The Pirates Vs. The Lost Boys (2mins 5)
- The Lost Pirate Song (1min 16)
Peter Pan: Black Castle
- Enter the Castle (1min 9)
- Come Fly With Me (6mins 4)
- The Mermaids Tale (2mins 7)
Multiple DVD-ROM Features
English, French & Spanish Subtitles

 

[Scotty_McW]

I thought this was a pretty fun movie, so I'll be picking it up!

 

[Lyle_JP]

You forgot to mention that other great special feature on family Universal DVDs:

- 5 Trailers that you CANNOT skip or press the MENU botton on.

*Sigh* Why couldn't Columbia be the distributor for this in the US? I guess I'll wait for a region 3 Superbit.

-Lyle J.P.

 

[Andy_MT]

least we forget, free home french lesson with easily disposable butt-ugly bi-lingual cover.

but in their defence, le universal do some rather nice "run disney into the ground" looking transfers.

 

[TomWoodward]

I've attached the horrible artwork below. If you're interested we've also posted a number of menu shots over on our site. I can't wait to see this one, Jason Isaacs is normally really good:

 

[Nate Anderson]

The artwork isn't appalingly bad, but one could've hoped for better.

At the same time, it was a good movie and I am glad to see this is getting a decent release.

 

[ThomasC]

Holy crap, that's one of the worst cover arts I've ever seen. The teaser poster was great:



The theatrical poster isn't as good, but still...

 

[ChrisBEA]

Should have used the teaser poster, that cover is really ugly.
The film was a real surprise, very well made.

 

[Justin Hargis]

Ouch, the coverart is horrible. I like the theatrical poster best. Oh well, guess I'll upgrade the cover down the road. I'll definitely pick this movie up. It's a very underrated film from 2003.

 

[MatthewLouwrens]

Great film. Loved it. Looking forward to buying it.

Truly awful cover art. Really. Rethink it. Go with the teaser poster - much more evocative and fascinating. If I saw that cover art on a film I hadn't seen before, I would decide NOT to pick it up.

 

[Kami]

Agreed, the cover makes it look low budget.

 

[DaViD Boulet]

Looks like an Anchor-bay 1.33:1 special by that cover!

 

[Jon Robertson]

"The Best Family Film Of The Year!"

They ain't lying.

I can't wait for May 5th. It's a great pity that so many people are going to ignore this quite extraordinary adaptation - infinitely better and more respectful to the source than I was expecting.

A shame about the cover art and the rather pithy-looking featurettes. Mind you, that seems to be the lot for most "special editions" nowadays.

 

[Dan Hitchman]

They should have dumped the French 5.1 track for a DTS track, but what can ya do?

Dan

 

[Jon Robertson]

Blame the Canadians?