Patrick Sun
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 1999
- Messages
- 39,669
This could have been a better film, but as it is, it's like a snapshot of dotcom bull ride in 1999-2000 in terms of how a rich dotcommer falls in love with a stripper and convinces her to go to Las Vegas with him for a weekend.
Where the film fails is in crafting characters that you become empathetic towards while the film unfolds. They mainly remain iconic in their place in the film, and you never get a sense of either one progressing, perhaps even regressing a bit by the end of the film. But it's sort of interesting from the standpoint of how power in their relationship shifts moment to moment (money for sex, sex for money).
Molly Parker is an actress to watch, she's mesmerizing. Peter Sarsgaard is the rich, but out of touch, dotcommer who falls in love with the stripper played by Molly.
But, one of the main reasons to at least rent this film (if you can handle the unrated "Pretty Woman" aspect of the film) is for the commentary of this film by the direction Wayne Wang (who directed "The Joy Luck Club" and "Anywhere But Here"), and the post production wizard who gave the film its "look" (I forget his last name, but his first name is "Patrick").
I didn't realize how experimental this film was in the technical aspects of shooting the film. This is due to the film shoot totally on Betacam, or mini-DV cam, which allowed for very intimate film-making (much smaller cameras than the standard film cameras) and thus less intrusive, allowing the actors to be less aware of the cameras and more into the scenes. Anyhow, in post-production, you can do some nifty things in the digital realm that would be too costly to do with film (bleaching out scenes, color correcting, emphasizing and de-emphasizing colors), but the digital cameras require a new attitude to shoot with, and they come with their own quirks that need to be thought out before shooting scenes (like trying to maintain lighting continuity from different cameras for the same scene with shade and lighting challenges). Once the digital film was processed in post production, then it got converted over to film. All in all, pretty neat commentary on the film-making aspects using new digital camera technology. There's very short, incisive commentary on the film's story, but Wang does give you his take, but leaves it for the viewer to come to their own conclusions (though I do side with Wang's interpretation on how the ending plays out).
(I was rather conflicted as to where to place this post, either in the Movies area, or the software area, but I think it belongs in the Movies area if anyone else wants to discuss the story or the way it was filmed.)
Where the film fails is in crafting characters that you become empathetic towards while the film unfolds. They mainly remain iconic in their place in the film, and you never get a sense of either one progressing, perhaps even regressing a bit by the end of the film. But it's sort of interesting from the standpoint of how power in their relationship shifts moment to moment (money for sex, sex for money).
Molly Parker is an actress to watch, she's mesmerizing. Peter Sarsgaard is the rich, but out of touch, dotcommer who falls in love with the stripper played by Molly.
But, one of the main reasons to at least rent this film (if you can handle the unrated "Pretty Woman" aspect of the film) is for the commentary of this film by the direction Wayne Wang (who directed "The Joy Luck Club" and "Anywhere But Here"), and the post production wizard who gave the film its "look" (I forget his last name, but his first name is "Patrick").
I didn't realize how experimental this film was in the technical aspects of shooting the film. This is due to the film shoot totally on Betacam, or mini-DV cam, which allowed for very intimate film-making (much smaller cameras than the standard film cameras) and thus less intrusive, allowing the actors to be less aware of the cameras and more into the scenes. Anyhow, in post-production, you can do some nifty things in the digital realm that would be too costly to do with film (bleaching out scenes, color correcting, emphasizing and de-emphasizing colors), but the digital cameras require a new attitude to shoot with, and they come with their own quirks that need to be thought out before shooting scenes (like trying to maintain lighting continuity from different cameras for the same scene with shade and lighting challenges). Once the digital film was processed in post production, then it got converted over to film. All in all, pretty neat commentary on the film-making aspects using new digital camera technology. There's very short, incisive commentary on the film's story, but Wang does give you his take, but leaves it for the viewer to come to their own conclusions (though I do side with Wang's interpretation on how the ending plays out).
(I was rather conflicted as to where to place this post, either in the Movies area, or the software area, but I think it belongs in the Movies area if anyone else wants to discuss the story or the way it was filmed.)