- Joined
- Feb 8, 1999
- Messages
- 18,427
- Real Name
- Robert Harris
Thinking back, I don't believe that I ever considered Frank Sinatra to be a serious actor. He had some performances worth noting, but I'd never go out of my way to see a Sinatra film.
I was reading some points made by Roger Ebert, and I believe his thoughts to be correct.
Give Mr. Sinatra a truly great director, and he has the capability to shine. In the hands of filmmakers such as Gordon Douglas, who did fine, workmanlike films, he tends to go toward being Sinatra. As Mr. Ebert notes in his review of Lady in Cement: "[Sinatra] is running the show, slipping in-jokes over on us, writing in guest appearances for his needy friends. That's the problem with Sinatra, I guess. His personal empire is so large he doesn't need to venture outside for directors, producers, writers, friends. And since the employees of Sinatra & Co. don't like to say no to the big man, Sinatra winds up in lousy movies in spite of himself."
But The Detective is better than Lady in Cement, and more like Tony Rome, with Mr. Sinatra playing, as Mr. Ebert also pointed out, a Bogart-type detective, except that he's no Bogart and his detective trilogy (1967-8) for Fox, Tony Rome, The Detective and Lady in Cement, are no Maltese Falcons.
The Detective seems to be the best of the trilogy, and it's a decent, gritty detective story.
The HD master supplied to Twilight Time by Fox is quite beautiful. In fact, everything is right with it, and it's a great representation of Joseph Biroc's cinematography -- what a good-looking Fox scope production would look like c. 1968.
One can only wonder what the films might have been like with a stronger director.
Image - 5
Audio - 5
4k Up-rez - 5
Pass / Fail - Pass
Recommended
RAH
I was reading some points made by Roger Ebert, and I believe his thoughts to be correct.
Give Mr. Sinatra a truly great director, and he has the capability to shine. In the hands of filmmakers such as Gordon Douglas, who did fine, workmanlike films, he tends to go toward being Sinatra. As Mr. Ebert notes in his review of Lady in Cement: "[Sinatra] is running the show, slipping in-jokes over on us, writing in guest appearances for his needy friends. That's the problem with Sinatra, I guess. His personal empire is so large he doesn't need to venture outside for directors, producers, writers, friends. And since the employees of Sinatra & Co. don't like to say no to the big man, Sinatra winds up in lousy movies in spite of himself."
But The Detective is better than Lady in Cement, and more like Tony Rome, with Mr. Sinatra playing, as Mr. Ebert also pointed out, a Bogart-type detective, except that he's no Bogart and his detective trilogy (1967-8) for Fox, Tony Rome, The Detective and Lady in Cement, are no Maltese Falcons.
The Detective seems to be the best of the trilogy, and it's a decent, gritty detective story.
The HD master supplied to Twilight Time by Fox is quite beautiful. In fact, everything is right with it, and it's a great representation of Joseph Biroc's cinematography -- what a good-looking Fox scope production would look like c. 1968.
One can only wonder what the films might have been like with a stronger director.
Image - 5
Audio - 5
4k Up-rez - 5
Pass / Fail - Pass
Recommended
RAH