What's new

Trancas

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
347
Real Name
Eric
To clarify about the German double feature set:

The Ripley version is available on both Italian and German BDs, but the the encoding is slightly better on the Italian in terms of tech specs. however the German has lossless English mono whereas the Italian does not. The German is Region free, the Italian is not and more expensive.

According to the back cover of the Italian version it's region-free.

ItalianPerUnPugnoDiDollari.jpg
 

haineshisway

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,570
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
Bruce
The Italian is absolutely region-free and for my money looks a bit better than the German. And I'm sorry - the English mono is fine on the Italian - no one is going to be able to hear a whit of difference on an old mono track whether it's lossless or not.
 

Jordan Krug

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
90
The Italian is absolutely region-free and for my money looks a bit better than the German. And I'm sorry - the English mono is fine on the Italian - no one is going to be able to hear a whit of difference on an old mono track whether it's lossless or not.

Yes the German and Japan discs both are slightly darker and a shade more red than the Italian, the Italian looks more natural. The extras that are 23.98 on the Italian disc (like the original Italian trailer which is comprised entirely of alternate takes and angles) will play fine but I'm pretty sure it has a couple of SD extras in PAL.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,425
Real Name
Robert Harris
Dear Mr. @Robert Harris, why you and your colleagues don't say anything to Ritrovata/ Eclair before they "ruin" more movies with the teal-yellow cast?
There are dozens blurays already with the exact same color palette (some of them my favourite films, that I haven't bought due to this).
Maybe they'll listen to you, that their settings are wrong. (i don't know exactly what is the problem)

Possibly because the licensee / licensor likes what they’re seeing, and one cannot always be the restoration police.

Not my battle.
 

JoshZ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
2,300
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
I don't understand why this is allowed to continue-especially since there was an outcry about the poorly done OUATIA Italian extended release that was later revised and redone by Warner for their USA release of the longer version.

Are you sure Once Upon a Time in America was redone by Warner? That disc received a lot of complaints about weird colors when it was released in 2014.
 

haineshisway

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,570
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
Bruce
Warners did NOT revise anything - that "restoration" is perhaps the biggest debacle I've EVER seen anywhere. Completely drained of color so that the added sub-par bits wouldn't stick out so much. a) those bits should NEVER have been added - they do nothing for the film and Mr. Leone released his version of the long cut and didn't include them. Whatever problems the original Warners Blu of that Leone long cut were (and it's included with the "restoration" - the color is absolutely perfect. All one wants is a new transfer with that proper color timing of the original cut. The film deserves it and so do we. And frankly, I have never understood why Warners haven't included the crazy short version they released to theaters, which is the way many of us first saw the film. Just as a curio, and as a curio it really is fascinating and in a couple of instances it works better in terms of emotion. I love this film and I HATE that "restoration" beyond words. Anyone who thinks that's good or a proper representation of Tonino Delli Colli's brilliant photography needs to turn in their Leone card.
 

Spencer Draper

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
195
Location
TN
Real Name
Spencer Draper
Warners did NOT revise anything - that "restoration" is perhaps the biggest debacle I've EVER seen anywhere. Completely drained of color so that the added sub-par bits wouldn't stick out so much. a) those bits should NEVER have been added - they do nothing for the film and Mr. Leone released his version of the long cut and didn't include them. Whatever problems the original Warners Blu of that Leone long cut were (and it's included with the "restoration" - the color is absolutely perfect. All one wants is a new transfer with that proper color timing of the original cut. The film deserves it and so do we. And frankly, I have never understood why Warners haven't included the crazy short version they released to theaters, which is the way many of us first saw the film. Just as a curio, and as a curio it really is fascinating and in a couple of instances it works better in terms of emotion. I love this film and I HATE that "restoration" beyond words. Anyone who thinks that's good or a proper representation of Tonino Delli Colli's brilliant photography needs to turn in their Leone card.
I can actually agree with that 100% though I was under the impression WB did something to improve upon the original Italian release disc. The longer edit while filling in some narrative gaps really harms the film and its flow and additionally the new color throughout is off putting. The degraded bits are extremely distracting and doubly so since they appear like sore thumbs and interrupt the 229 minute version. Unfortunately this is now becoming the new standard version in theaters via DCP. I still think Leone removed those scenes with good reason.
I quite agree the original transfer is fine and looks just like the previous editions. While the master may be old and could be better encoded-it is a fine one. The letterboxed Laserdisc is identical to the DVD and is such a good transfer it ranks among the best I've ever seen on that format-plus it has the original mono mix.
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
7,898
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
And Warners don't control the title anymore; the latest Blu-ray release is from Fox, as the rights have reverted to New Regency [Arnon Milchan]. Not sure if their release of the "restored" edition includes the original Warner master as well.
 

Vincent_P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2003
Messages
2,147
Re: OUATIA, Warners *did* revise their Blu-ray version, in that they cropped the image from 1.85:1 to 1.78:1. And no, they didn't open it up, they cropped the sides of the 1.85:1 hard-matted master. But colorwise, yeah they didn't touch it. Warners was doing this cropping a lot at the time and never got called out on it. They also cropped their Blu-ray of DOMINION: PREQUEL TO THE EXORCIST from 2:1 to 1.78:1, EXORCIST II from 1.85:1 to 1.78, and I imagine there were other examples as well. Nobody seemed to care, though.

I think Spencer might be referring to the Warners Blu-ray having better compression than the Italian release, which was swimming with digital artifacts.

Vincent
 

Jordan Krug

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
90
Mr. Harris, wondering if you can tell us, does the new Kino disc feature the alternate opening seen here in clips below (Joe steals the poncho from a man by the river)? I know the Kino disc features outtakes/dailies but the ones in this video below were mostly not used on the previous Italian blu release. It appears that all the raw footage survives. I'm assuming the Kino disc is simply porting over the outtakes from the Italian release but I'm hoping that they have included more like the ones in this video below?



Well, got the disc...some nice extras but the outtakes on the Kino are simply this same YouTube video (above) that's been around since 2014, (but in better quality and without titles) . A shame they didn't try to acquire the whole alternate opening only glimpsed in this video. Maybe the Italians will do their own 4K release and take advantage of this missed opportunity.
 

Trancas

Second Unit
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
347
Real Name
Eric
A comparison of the available discs:



Wow that new Kino restoration looks peculiar.....like greenish outtakes from the underwater scenes in "The Shape of Water"! How could the multiple sets of eyes that were involved in the production of the latest restoration have thought this was correct and pleasing?
 

haineshisway

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,570
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
Bruce
Can't judge on the computer - not possible. BUT, if we must play the game, the Italian (Ripley) is best for color but on my computer does not quite resemble what the disc actually looks like on a calibrated screen. That said, the detail in the Kino is best, clearly, and I'd actually now be interested to see it on my screen, just for interest.
 

Bob Cashill

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2001
Messages
3,799
Real Name
Robert Cashill
Warners did NOT revise anything - that "restoration" is perhaps the biggest debacle I've EVER seen anywhere. Completely drained of color so that the added sub-par bits wouldn't stick out so much. a) those bits should NEVER have been added - they do nothing for the film and Mr. Leone released his version of the long cut and didn't include them. Whatever problems the original Warners Blu of that Leone long cut were (and it's included with the "restoration" - the color is absolutely perfect. All one wants is a new transfer with that proper color timing of the original cut. The film deserves it and so do we. And frankly, I have never understood why Warners haven't included the crazy short version they released to theaters, which is the way many of us first saw the film. Just as a curio, and as a curio it really is fascinating and in a couple of instances it works better in terms of emotion. I love this film and I HATE that "restoration" beyond words. Anyone who thinks that's good or a proper representation of Tonino Delli Colli's brilliant photography needs to turn in their Leone card.
The new German Blu-ray of HEAVEN'S GATE includes the shortened version as an extra (in HD, for the first time). I also saw the short version of ...AMERICA, and wouldn't mind having it back, either, if only as a curiosity.
 

PMF

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
6,011
Real Name
Philip
I have seen all 3 versions of "Once Upon a Time in America";
and based upon their chronological U.S. release dates my reviews are as follows:
Bad, Good and Ugly.
 
Last edited:

Scott Merryfield

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 16, 1998
Messages
18,897
Location
Mich. & S. Carolina
Real Name
Scott Merryfield
My copy of the German release of A Fistful of Dollars and A Few Dollars More arrived today, and I gave the first film a spin. I want to thank those HTF members who recommended this version --the transfer was very good. I'm glad I bought this set instead of the Kino release. Maybe someday we will get a proper release of the complete trilogy here in the U.S., but until then this version will keep me satisfied.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,068
Messages
5,129,976
Members
144,283
Latest member
Nielmb
Recent bookmarks
0
Top