which to use? tv or avr

Discussion in 'Beginners, General Questions' started by rwrod, Oct 5, 2012.

  1. rwrod

    rwrod Auditioning

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello. I just had a 92 inch MIT deliver. First big screen in 10yrs to replace a 65 inch. The guy who set it up said to use the tv as the switch to change between inputs. Said it was better and less signal loss. To just use the AVR for sound only. On my old system I use the AVR to switch. Which is better?
     
  2. schan1269

    schan1269 HTF Expert
    HW Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    17,112
    Likes Received:
    899
    Location:
    Chicago-ish/NW Indiana
    Real Name:
    Sam
    That guy is an idiot.
    You can use the TV for your switch if you are happy with everything being in 2.0 and you like DPL and don't care to ever use DD, DTS, DTS HD-MA or Dolby True HD. (probably missed a few)
     
  3. gene c

    gene c Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Bay area, Ca
    Real Name:
    Gene
    There's nothing wrong with using the display to switch the video, but having the receiver do it while it's also switching the audio is much easier. I think it's been proven that running the video through current avr's doesn't effect the video quality one bit. If you have an older pre-hdmi receiver and a bluray player then it might be better to run the video from the BR player straight to the display with hdmi. Otherwise, plug everything into the receiver and let the avr (audio/video receiver :) ) do it. HDMI is better for video then component.
     
  4. Type A

    Type A HW Reviewer
    HW Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Messages:
    800
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Real Name:
    Ty
    Remember its not just about switching, its about processing also. It depends on your video processor and implementation in your gear on which will give you the best performance. My Sherwood AVR has the highly-touted REON video processor but the implementation seems poor as using it seems to lower my picture quality (and yeah Ive tweaked it for hours). So I use bypass in the AVR and let either the source or projector do the processing. While you might want to use your AVR as a switcher you might NOT want to use it as a video processor and depending on your AVR there may not be a way to bypass a mediocre video processor. I would check both ways and see if it makes a diff in PQ before deciding.
     

Share This Page