MikeKaz
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
- Messages
- 152
i have had nothing but a positive experience with my sr-7200. the source direct mode is incredible and has much more bass and texture than my sr-7000 did. this contrasts with it's regular stereo mode which is prett craptastic being to warm and not as open or detailed, but thats why source direct is there- i just listen to stuff in that if i want to. i question both the test results of sound and vision and the relevence of the power ratings they specify. i have no problem playing music extremely loud in all modes, and in two channel it can definately play better and louder than my 7000. the biggest indicator to me however was listening to the jurassic park DTS disc. i played the t-rex escaping from the pen scene and was absolutely amazed at the levels it was playing at with no problems. i had it at +8 (something i cant normally do at home) and my jbl-s38's were going nuts, but there was absolutely no clipping, distortion or compression from any speakers. i was actually worried, i was telling myself damn this is loud i wonder if im hurting anything besides my ears but lo and behold the sound was absolutely flawless, no distortion, even during passages with extremely high levels of base. i could not imagine playing any movie louder than it was. my hearing is still suffering from that day a couple of weeks ago. the funny thing is, whenever john q. regular asks if he should buy such and such a component or use whatever kind of setting for a certain reason, dozens of people will JUMP on him and give him the ubiquitous "yeah well uh you should just go for whatever sounds best to YOU, dont worry about all that technical junk". and yet after countless positive reviews of this receivers from completely satisfied owners, and people who have auditioned it in stores, people are screaming bloody murder because of one review in a magazine which gives a techincal specification. Now this receiver has fucking leprosy and anyone who buys it will be ruined for life. why not listen to the advice given by so many of yourselves and simply listen to the receiver and see if you enjoy it instead of following some number given in a magazine (which could be wrong or which could have come from a dud unit), and having that number in the back of your mind making you come up with reasons why this receiver is so sub par. i would give my goddamn left arm if there ever would have been as many complaints right now about the sound quality and performance of this speaker if this report came out later. its the old "well hmm someone says it should be bad, so yeah.. yeah you know i did notice before that it wasnt that good i just didnt say anything about it" syndrome. i didnt quite see anyone who had the balls to badmouth this receiver so much before this article came out, so it makes me wonder where the origins of the suddenly appearing "sound quality issues" are really rooted, regardless of its technical specifications. i have a korean unit by the way.